ReviewMolecular neurobiology2014
The glycosphingolipid hydrolases in the central nervous system.
Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Don't Be Surprised When These Surprise You: Some Infrequently Studied Sphingoid Bases, Metabolites, and Factors That Should Be Kept in Mind During Sphingolipidomic Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Long non-coding RNA and mRNA analysis of Ang II-induced neuronal dysfunction.Molecular biology reports · 2019Article
- A lysosome-plasma membrane-sphingolipid axis linking lysosomal storage to cell growth arrest.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2018Article
- The sugar code in neuronal physiology.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2017Review
- The Enigmatic Role of GBA2 in Controlling Locomotor Function.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2017Review
- Current and Novel Aspects on the Non-lysosomal β-Glucosylceramidase GBA2.Neurochemical research · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glycosphingolipids are a large group of complex lipids particularly abundant in the outer layer of the neuronal plasma membranes. Qualitative and quantitative changes in glycosphingolipids have been reported along neuronal differentiation and aging. Their half-life is short in the nervous system and their membrane composition and content are the result of a complex network of metabolic pathways involving both the de novo synthesis in the Golgi apparatus and the lysosomal catabolism. In particular, most of the enzymes of glycosphingolipid biosynthesis and catabolism have been found also at the plasma membrane level. Their action could be responsible for the fine tuning of the plasma membrane glycosphingolipid composition allowing the formation of highly specialized membrane areas, such as the synapses and the axonal growth cones. While the correlation between the changes of GSL pattern and the modulation of the expression/activity of different glycosyltransferases during the neuronal differentiation has been widely discussed, the role of the glycohydrolytic enzymes in this process is still little explored. For this reason, in the present review, we focus on the main glycolipid catabolic enzymes β-hexosaminidases, sialidases, β-galactosidases, and β-glucocerebrosidases in the process of the neuronal differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.