Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24282073›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Topical cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene replacement for cystic fibrosis-related lung disease.

Tim W R Lee, Kevin W Southern

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tim W R LeeLeeds Regional Paediatric Cystic Fibrosis Centre, A Floor, Clarendon Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK, LS1 3EX.
Kevin W Southern
Leeds General Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCystic fibrosis is caused by a defective gene encoding a protein called the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), and is characterised by chronic lung infection resulting in inflammation and progressive lung damage that results in a reduced life expectancy.

objectivesTo determine whether topical CFTR gene replacement therapy to the lungs in people with cystic fibrosis is associated with improvements in clinical outcomes, and to assess any adverse effects. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of most recent search: 22 August 2013.An additional search of the National Institutes for Health (NIH) Genetic Modification Clinical Research Information System (GeMCRIS) was also performed for the years 1992 to 2013.Date of most recent search: 04 September 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing topical CFTR gene delivery to the lung, using either viral or non-viral delivery systems, with placebo or an alternative delivery system in people with confirmed cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Authors of included studies were contacted and asked for any available additional data. Meta-analysis was limited due to differing study designs. MAIN

resultsThree randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria for this review, involving a total of 155 participants. Fourteen studies were excluded. The included studies differed in terms of CFTR gene replacement agent and study design, which limited the meta-analysis.Although the first Moss study reported a significant improvement in respiratory function (forced expiratory volume at one second) 30 days after participants had received their first dose of gene therapy agent, this finding was not confirmed in their larger second study or in our meta-analysis.In participants who received the CFTR gene transfer agents in the Alton study, "influenza-like" symptoms were found (risk ratio 7.00 (95% confidence interval 1.10 to 44.61)). There were no other significant increases in adverse events in any of the studies.Alton measured ion transport in the lower airways and demonstrated significant changes toward normal values in the participants who received gene transfer agents (P < 0.0001), mean difference 6.86 (95% confidence interval 3.77 to 9.95). In these participants there was also evidence of increased salt transport in cells obtained by brushing the lower airway. These outcomes, whilst important, are not of direct clinical relevance. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is currently no evidence to support the use of CFTR gene transfer agents as a treatment for lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis. Future studies need to investigate clinically important outcome measures.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Function TestsTargeted Gene RepairCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator

Identifiers

PMID24282073
OpenAlexW4229867118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.