SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2014
Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer: a review on sentinel node concept.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Esophageal Cancer: Many Routes to an Elusive Destination.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Esophageal Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Minimally invasive total adventitial resection of the cardia for tumours of the oesophagogastric junction.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- New Developments in Imaging for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2020Review
- Lymph node metastatic patterns and its clinical significance for thoracic superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2020Article
- Sentinel lymph node mapping in gynecological oncology.Oncology letters · 2017Article
- Oesophageal cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2017Review
- Nodal skip metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a cohort study.BMC surgery · 2017Article
- Sentinel node biopsy during thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for advanced esophageal cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2016Article
- Clinical Significance of Sentinel Node Positivity in Patients with Superficial Esophageal Cancer.World journal of surgery · 2015Article
- Case-matched analysis of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic versus open esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- Sentinel node mapping in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.World journal of surgery · 2014Article
- Lymph node metastasis and lymphadenectomy of resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2014Article
- Mapping lymph nodes in cancer management - role of (99m)Tc-tilmanocept injection.OncoTargets and therapy · 2014Review
- Identification of sentinel lymph nodes in esophageal cancer patients using contrast-enhanced EUS with peritumoral injections.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLymphoadenectomy is a cornerstone of esophageal cancer treatment, and sentinel node (SN) biopsy (SNB) might provide surgeons with an extra tool to limit unnecessarily extended lymphadenectomy and to implement a minimally invasive approach. The aim of our study was to review all the available literature on the use of SNB in esophageal surgery for malignancy.
methodsThe review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database to identify all original articles on the role of SNB in esophageal cancer. Data on methodologies, tumor stage and localization, and results were summarized and used to address relevant clinical questions related to the application of the SNB technique in esophageal cancer.
resultsTwelve studies were included, with a total of 492 patients. Different methods for SN identification were used (radionuclide, blue dye, computed tomography [CT] lymphography). The pooled values estimated using the random-effects model were, respectively: technetium-99 m overall detection rate (DR) 0.970 (95 % CI 0.814-0.996), accuracy (ACC) 0.902 (95 % CI 0.736-0.968); blue-dye DR 0.971 (95 % CI 0.890-0.993), ACC 0.790 (95 % CI 0.681-0.870); and CT lymphoscintigraphy DR 0.970 (95 % CI 0.814-0.996), ACC 0.902 (95 % CI 0.736-0.968).
conclusionBased on these results, the concept of SN in esophageal cancer is technically feasible with an acceptable DR and ACC, and it might be applicable in the event of early-stage adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction in patients with a high surgical risk or in a patient where an endoscopic resection is taken into consideration. Further studies focused on a single tumor type and localizations are needed in order to predict the correct utilization of this concept in minimally invasive treatment of esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.