Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24281155›Full record

ArticleGenetics2014

Effect of genetic variation in a Drosophila model of diabetes-associated misfolded human proinsulin.

Bin Z He, Michael Z Ludwig, Desiree A Dickerson, Levi Barse, Bharath Arun, Bjarni J Vilhjálmsson, Pengyao Jiang, Soo-Young Park, Natalia A Tamarina, Scott B Selleck and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A recombinantbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Genetics of Diabetes: What We Can Learn fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. AeLife · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Natural Genetic Variation Screen inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A Genomic Reference Panel forG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Jiang, Pengyao [added]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bin Z HeDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Michael Z Ludwig
Desiree A Dickerson
Levi Barse
Bharath Arun
Bjarni J Vilhjálmsson
Pengyao Jiang
Soo-Young Park
Natalia A Tamarina
Scott B Selleck
Patricia J Wittkopp
Graeme I Bell
Martin Kreitman
University of Chicago · USHarvard University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

TRANSGENIC COREP60DK020595 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BELL, GRAEME I · 1985 to 2012
$25.5M
Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK020595 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Matthew J Brady · 2013 to 2026
$20.9M
CORE: ADMINISTRATIVEP50GM081892 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WHITE, KEVIN P. · 2008 to 2013
$15.9M
STUDIES ON PANCREATIC HORMONESR01DK013914 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI STEINER, DONALD F · 1986 to 2011
$5.5M
PROTEOGLYCANS IN GROWTH FACTOR SIGNALING AND DEVELOPMENTR01GM054832 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SELLECK, SCOTT B · 1997 to 2010
$2.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020595NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK020595NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK013914NIGMS NIH HHS GM054832NIGMS NIH HHS GM081892NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM081892NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification and validation of gene-gene interactions is a major challenge in human studies. Here, we explore an approach for studying epistasis in humans using a Drosophila melanogaster model of neonatal diabetes mellitus. Expression of the mutant preproinsulin (hINS(C96Y)) in the eye imaginal disc mimics the human disease: it activates conserved stress-response pathways and leads to cell death (reduction in eye area). Dominant-acting variants in wild-derived inbred lines from the Drosophila Genetics Reference Panel produce a continuous, highly heritable distribution of eye-degeneration phenotypes in a hINS(C96Y) background. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 154 sequenced lines identified a sharp peak on chromosome 3L, which mapped to a 400-bp linkage block within an intron of the gene sulfateless (sfl). RNAi knockdown of sfl enhanced the eye-degeneration phenotype in a mutant-hINS-dependent manner. RNAi against two additional genes in the heparan sulfate (HS) biosynthetic pathway (ttv and botv), in which sfl acts, also modified the eye phenotype in a hINS(C96Y)-dependent manner, strongly suggesting a novel link between HS-modified proteins and cellular responses to misfolded proteins. Finally, we evaluated allele-specific expression difference between the two major sfl-intronic haplotypes in heterozygtes. The results showed significant heterogeneity in marker-associated gene expression, thereby leaving the causal mutation(s) and its mechanism unidentified. In conclusion, the ability to create a model of human genetic disease, map a QTL by GWAS to a specific gene, and validate its contribution to disease with available genetic resources and the potential to experimentally link the variant to a molecular mechanism demonstrate the many advantages Drosophila holds in determining the genetic underpinnings of human disease.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAllelesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDiabetes MellitusDisease Models, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEpistasis, GeneticEyeFemaleGene ExpressionGene Knockdown TechniquesGenome-Wide Association StudyHeparan SulfateHumansDrosophila ProteinsHeparan SulfateProinsulinsfl protein, DrosophilaSulfotransferasesDrosophilagenome-wide association studyheparan sulfate proteoglycanmutant insulinsulfateless

Identifiers

PMID24281155
PMCPMC3914626
OpenAlexW2078121886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.