ArticleGenetics2014
Genetic complexity in a Drosophila model of diabetes-associated misfolded human proinsulin.
Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- A recombinantbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Dysregulation of Glial Gap Junction Protein Innexin2 Mediates Seizures and Disrupted Sleep in a Drosophila Model for North Sea Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy.Journal of neuroscience research · 2025Article
- The Genetics of Diabetes: What We Can Learn fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Large-Scale TransgenicGenetics · 2020Article
- Aging and the clock: Perspective from flies to humans.The European journal of neuroscience · 2020Review
- Immune Control of Animal Growth in Homeostasis and Nutritional Stress inFrontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Genetic Modifiers of Neurodegeneration in aGenetics · 2018Article
- The road less traveled: from genotype to phenotype in flies and humans.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018Article
- Charting the genotype-phenotype map: lessons from the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2018Review
- A Bystander Mechanism Explains the Specific Phenotype of a Broadly Expressed Misfolded Protein.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- Candidate genetic modifiers of retinitis pigmentosa identified by exploiting natural variation in Drosophila.Human molecular genetics · 2016Article
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction Plus High-Sugar Diet Provokes a Metabolic Crisis That Inhibits Growth.PloS one · 2016Article
- Genome-wide identification of allele-specific expression in response to Streptococcus suis 2 infection in two differentially susceptible pig breeds.Journal of applied genetics · 2015Article
- Drosophila as a model for unfolded protein response research.BMB reports · 2015Review
- Effect of genetic variation in a Drosophila model of diabetes-associated misfolded human proinsulin.Genetics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Drosophila melanogaster has been widely used as a model of human Mendelian disease, but its value in modeling complex disease has received little attention. Fly models of complex disease would enable high-resolution mapping of disease-modifying loci and the identification of novel targets for therapeutic intervention. Here, we describe a fly model of permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus and explore the complexity of this model. The approach involves the transgenic expression of a misfolded mutant of human preproinsulin, hINS(C96Y), which is a cause of permanent neonatal diabetes. When expressed in fly imaginal discs, hINS(C96Y) causes a reduction of adult structures, including the eye, wing, and notum. Eye imaginal discs exhibit defects in both the structure and the arrangement of ommatidia. In the wing, expression of hINS(C96Y) leads to ectopic expression of veins and mechano-sensory organs, indicating disruption of wild-type signaling processes regulating cell fates. These readily measurable "disease" phenotypes are sensitive to temperature, gene dose, and sex. Mutant (but not wild-type) proinsulin expression in the eye imaginal disc induces IRE1-mediated XBP1 alternative splicing, a signal for endoplasmic reticulum stress response activation, and produces global change in gene expression. Mutant hINS transgene tester strains, when crossed to stocks from the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel, produce F1 adults with a continuous range of disease phenotypes and large broad-sense heritability. Surprisingly, the severity of mutant hINS-induced disease in the eye is not correlated with that in the notum in these crosses, nor with eye reduction phenotypes caused by the expression of two dominant eye mutants acting in two different eye development pathways, Drop (Dr) or Lobe (L), when crossed into the same genetic backgrounds. The tissue specificity of genetic variability for mutant hINS-induced disease has, therefore, its own distinct signature. The genetic dominance of disease-specific phenotypic variability in our model of misfolded human proinsulin makes this approach amenable to genome-wide association study in a simple F1 screen of natural variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.