Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24279471›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2014

Prognostic value of a nine-gene signature in glioma patients based on mRNA expression profiling.

Zhao-Shi Bao, Ming-Yang Li, Jia-Yin Wang, Chuan-Bao Zhang, Hong-Jun Wang, Wei Yan, Yan-Wei Liu, Wei Zhang, Ling Chen, Tao Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Multi-Omics Approaches in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bioinformatics Analysis and Screening of Potential Target Genes Related to the Lung Cancer Prognosis.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Identification of NNeurosurgical review · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhao-Shi BaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ming-Yang Li
Jia-Yin Wang
Chuan-Bao Zhang
Hong-Jun Wang
Wei Yan
Yan-Wei Liu
Wei Zhang
Ling Chen
Tao Jiang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGliomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults and a significant cause of cancer-related mortality. A 9-gene signature was identified as a novel prognostic model reflecting survival situation obviously in gliomas.

aimsTo identify an mRNA expression signature to improve outcome prediction for patients with different glioma grades.

resultsWe used whole-genome mRNA expression microarray data of 220 glioma samples of all grades from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) database (http://www.cgga.org.cn) as a discovery set and data from Rembrandt and GSE16011 for validation sets. Data from every single grade were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method with a two-sided log-rank test. Univariate Cox regression and linear risk score formula were applied to derive a gene signature with better prognostic performance. We found that patients who had high risk score according to the signature had poor overall survival compared with patients who had low risk score. Highly expressed genes in the high-risk group were analyzed by gene ontology (GO) and gene set variation analysis (GSVA). As a result, the reason for the divisibility of gliomas was likely due to cell life processes and adhesion.

conclusionThis 9-gene-signature prediction model provided a more accurate predictor of prognosis that denoted patients with high risk score have poor outcome. Moreover, these risk models based on defined molecular profiles showed the considerable prospect in personalized cancer management.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingBrain NeoplasmsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic VariationGenomic LibraryGliomaHistone DeacetylasesHumansInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsKaplan-Meier EstimateMembrane ProteinsMetallothioneinMicroarray AnalysisBIRC5 protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportHDAC4 protein, humanHistone DeacetylasesInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMetallothioneinMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMT1E protein, humanNuclear Proteinsrab1 GTP-Binding ProteinsRepressor ProteinsRNA, MessengerSFXN4 protein, humanSurvivinTEAD2 protein, humanTEA Domain Transcription FactorsTPX2 protein, humanTranscription FactorsTUBA1B protein, humanTubulinBiomarkerGliomasmRNAPrognosisRisk score

Identifiers

PMID24279471
PMCPMC6493176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.