Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24279296›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

A feasibility study examining the effect on lung cancer diagnosis of offering a chest X-ray to higher-risk patients with chest symptoms: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Christopher N Hurt, Kirsty Roberts, Trevor K Rogers, Gareth O Griffiths, Kerry Hood, Hayley Prout, Annmarie Nelson, Jim Fitzgibbon, Allan Barham, Emma Thomas-Jones and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01344005 (A Pilot Clinical Trial Looking at the Effect on Lung Cancer Diagnosis of Giving a CXR to Smokers Aged Over 60 With Chest Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01344005 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Pilot Clinical Trial Looking at the Effect on Lung Cancer Diagnosis of Giving a CXR to Smokers Aged Over 60 With Chest Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorWales Cancer Trials UnitRan2011Enrolled386ConditionsLung Cancer, Tobacco Use DisorderArmscaregiver-related intervention or procedure, questionnaire administration, quality-of-life assessment, radiography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Improving early diagnosis of symptomatic cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher N HurtWales Cancer Trials Unit, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. hurtcn@cardiff.ac.uk.
Kirsty Roberts
Trevor K Rogers
Gareth O Griffiths
Kerry Hood
Hayley Prout
Annmarie Nelson
Jim Fitzgibbon
Allan Barham
Emma Thomas-Jones
Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
Seow Tien Yeo
William Hamilton
Angela Tod
Richard D Neal
Cardiff University · GBBangor University · GBDoncaster Royal Infirmary · GBMarie Curie · GBMarie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool · GBSheffield Hallam University · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Wales · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12199Cancer Research UK 15954Cancer Research UK C8350/A12199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to improve lung cancer survival in the UK, a greater proportion of resectable cancers must be diagnosed. It is likely that resectability rates would be increased by more timely diagnosis. Aside from screening, the only way of achieving this is to reduce the time to diagnosis in symptomatic cancers. Currently, lung cancers are mainly diagnosed by general practitioners (GPs) using the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for urgent referral for chest X-ray, which recommend urgent imaging or referral for patients who have one of a number of chest symptoms for more than 3 weeks. We are proposing to expand this recommendation to include one of a number of chest symptoms of any duration in higher-risk patients. METHODS/

designWe intend to conduct a trial of imaging in these higher-risk patients and compare it with NICE guidelines to see if imaging improves stage at diagnosis and resection rates. This trial would have to be large (and consequently resource-intensive) because most of these patients will not have lung cancer, making optimal design crucial. We are therefore conducting a pilot trial that will ascertain the feasibility of running a full trial and provide key information that will be required in order to design the full trial. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the feasibility and inform the design of a large, UK-wide, clinical trial of a change to the NICE guidelines for urgent referral for chest X-ray for suspected lung cancer. It utilizes a combination of workshop, health economic, quality of life, qualitative, and quantitative methods in order to fully assess feasibility.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01344005.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsRadiography, ThoracicData CollectionFeasibility StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsOutcome Assessment, Health CareResearch DesignRiskSample Size

Identifiers

PMID24279296
PMCPMC4222751
OpenAlexW2106641243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.