Trial reportBMC public health2013
Children, parents and pets exercising together (CPET): exploratory randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Overflow Effects of Movement Behaviour Change Interventions for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Pooled it
- Effective and resource-efficient strategies for recruiting families in physical activity, sedentary behavior, nutrition, and obesity prevention research: A systematic review with expert opinion.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021Pooled it
- Do Interventions to Increase Walking Work? A Systematic Review of Interventions in Children and Adolescents.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2016Pooled it
- Family-based interventions to increase physical activity in children: a systematic review, meta-analysis and realist synthesis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2016Pooled it
- A comparison of the effectiveness of physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions in reducing sedentary time in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2014Pooled it
- The impact of a dog-facilitated mobile physical activity intervention on children's social-emotional development: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2026Trial
- A mobile health intervention to encourage physical activity in children: a randomised controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2022Trial
- Longitudinal effects of dog ownership, dog acquisition, and dog loss on children's movement behaviours: findings from the PLAYCE cohort study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024Article
- Developing and evaluating a health pack to support dog owners to manage the weight of their companion animals.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- The Association between Adult Sport, Fitness, and Recreational Physical Activity and Number and Age of Children Present in the Household: A Secondary Analysis Using NHANES.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Testing Leash Walking Training as a Physical Activity Intervention for Older Adult Dog Owners: A Feasibility Study.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Human Behaviour Change Interventions in Animal Care and Interactive Settings: A Review and Framework for Design and Evaluation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Review
- The Concerns, Difficulties, and Stressors of Caring for Pets during COVID-19: Results from a Large Survey of U.S. Pet Owners.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Family-based habit intervention to promote parent support for child physical activity in Canada: protocol for a randomised trial.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Socio-demographic factors associated with pet ownership amongst adolescents from a UK birth cohort.BMC veterinary research · 2019Article
- Gait Pattern, Impact to the Skeleton and Postural Balance in Overweight and Obese Children: A Review.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- To a Future Where Everyone Can Walk a Dog Even if They Don't Own One.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
- Pet dogs and child physical activity: the role of child-dog attachment.Pediatric obesity · 2017Article
- I Walk My Dog Because It Makes Me Happy: A Qualitative Study to Understand Why Dogs Motivate Walking and Improved Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLevels of physical activity (PA) in UK children are much lower than recommended and novel approaches to its promotion are needed. The Children, Parents and Pets Exercising Together (CPET) study is the first exploratory randomised controlled trial (RCT) to develop and evaluate an intervention aimed at dog-based PA promotion in families. CPET aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability and potential efficacy of a theory-driven, family-based, dog walking intervention for 9-11 year olds.
methodsTwenty-eight families were allocated randomly to either receive a 10-week dog based PA intervention or to a control group. Families in the intervention group were motivated and supported to increase the frequency, intensity and duration of dog walking using a number of behaviour change techniques. Parents in the intervention group were asked to complete a short study exit questionnaire. In addition, focus groups with parents and children in the intervention group, and with key stakeholders were undertaken. The primary outcome measure was 10 week change in total volume of PA using the mean accelerometer count per minute (cpm). Intervention and control groups were compared using analysis of covariance. Analysis was performed on an intention to treat basis.
resultsTwenty five families were retained at follow up (89%) and 97% of all outcome data were collected at baseline and follow up. Thirteen of 14 (93%) intervention group parents available at follow up completed the study exit questionnaire and noted that study outcome measures were acceptable. There was a mean difference in child total volume of PA of 27 cpm (95% CI -70, 123) and -3 cpm (95% CI -60, 54) for intervention and control group children, respectively. This was not statistically significant. Approximately 21% of dog walking time for parents and 39% of dog walking time for children was moderate-vigorous PA.
conclusionsThe acceptability of the CPET intervention and outcome measures was high. Using pet dogs as the agent of lifestyle change in PA interventions in children and their parents is both feasible and acceptable, but did not result in a significant increase in child PA in this exploratory trial.
trial registrationISRCTN85939423.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.