ArticlePloS one2013
The effect of CO2 on algal growth in industrial waste water for bioenergy and bioremediation applications.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A New Modeling Approach for Predicting the Growth of Filamentous Algae in Outdoor Algae-Based Wastewater Treatment Systems.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Article
- Temperate-zone cultivation of Oedogonium in municipal wastewater effluent to produce cellulose and oxygen.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2020Article
- Effect of COHeliyon · 2019Article
- Biochemical evolution in response to intensive harvesting in algae: Evolution of quality and quantity.Evolutionary applications · 2018Article
- Valorization of SpentFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- A Review on the Valorization of Macroalgal Wastes for Biomethane Production.Marine drugs · 2016Review
- Biochar from commercially cultivated seaweed for soil amelioration.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Article
- Growth and metal bioconcentration by conspecific freshwater macroalgae cultured in industrial waste water.PeerJ · 2014Article
- Removing constraints on the biomass production of freshwater macroalgae by manipulating water exchange to manage nutrient flux.PloS one · 2014Article
- Bioremediation of a complex industrial effluent by biosorbents derived from freshwater macroalgae.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The energy, mining and mineral processing industries are point sources of metal-contaminated waste water and carbon dioxide (CO2). Freshwater macroalgae from the genus Oedogonium can be grown in metal-contaminated waste water to generate biomass for bioenergy applications and concomitantly bioremediate metals. However, interactions between CO2 addition and algal growth, which can affect bioremediation, remain untested. The addition of CO2 to algal cultures in the Ash Dam Water (ADW) from a coal-fired power station increased the biomass productivity of Oedogonium sp. from 6.8 g dry weight (DW) m(-2) d(-1) to a maximum of 22.5 g DW m(-2) d(-1). The greater productivity increased the rate of bioremediation of most elements. However, over time carbon-amended cultures experienced a decline in productivity. Possible explanations include metal toxicity at low pH or essential trace element limitation as a result of competition between toxic and essential trace elements for uptake into algae. Higher productivity increased bioremediation rate and yielded more biomass for bioenergy applications, making maintenance of maximum productivity the central aim of the integrated culture model. To do so it will be necessary to resolve the mechanisms responsible for declining yields over time in carbon-amended cultures. Regardless, our data demonstrate that freshwater macroalgae are ideal candidates for bioremediation of metal-contaminated waste streams. Algal culture delivered significant improvement in ADW quality, reducing 5 elements that were initially in excess of water quality criteria (Al, As, Cd, Ni and Zn) to meet guidelines within two to four weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.