ArticlePloS one2013
Molecular analysis of bacterial communities and detection of potential pathogens in a recirculating aquaculture system for Scophthalmus maximus and Solea senegalensis.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of feeding different baits on the growth of Scylla paramamosain megalopa and the bacterial community in a mariculture system.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Acute Effect of Short-Term Benzocaine Anesthesia on the Skin Mucus Microbiome of Atlantic salmon (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- A novel high-throughput qPCR chip for solving co-infections in RAS farmed rainbow trout.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Marine Bacterioplankton Community Dynamics and Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria in Seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, via Metabarcoding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Bioactive Molecules from Marine Diatoms and Their Value for the Nutraceutical Industry.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Sole microbiome progression in a hatchery life cycle, from egg to juvenile.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Bacterial communities in co-cultured fish intestines and rice field soil irrigated with aquaculture wastewater.AMB Express · 2022Article
- Comparison of two commercial recirculated aquacultural systems and their microbial potential in plant disease suppression.BMC microbiology · 2021Article
- Distinct bacterial communities in the environmental water, sediment and intestine between two crayfish-plant coculture ecosystems.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Advancements in CharacterizingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Bacterial Community Dynamics During Nursery Rearing of Pacific White Shrimp (Indian journal of microbiology · 2020Article
- Effects of water recirculation rate on the microbial community and water quality in relation to the growth and survival of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei).BMC microbiology · 2019Article
- Bacterial community analysis of marine recirculating aquaculture system bioreactors for complete nitrogen removal established from a commercial inoculum.Aquaculture (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- Modulation of Intestinal Microbiota inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Sponge Prokaryote Communities in Taiwanese Coral Reef and Shallow Hydrothermal Vent Ecosystems.Microbial ecology · 2018Article
- Bacterial biofilm development during experimental degradation ofAIMS microbiology · 2018Article
- Taxonomic and Functional Metagenomic Profile of Sediment From a Commercial Catfish Pond in Mississippi.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Molecular Taxonomic Profiling of Bacterial Communities in a Gilthead Seabream (Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study combined a DGGE and barcoded 16S rRNA pyrosequencing approach to assess bacterial composition in the water of a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) with a shallow raceway system (SRS) for turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and sole (Solea senegalensis). Barcoded pyrosequencing results were also used to determine the potential pathogen load in the RAS studied. Samples were collected from the water supply pipeline (Sup), fish production tanks (Pro), sedimentation filter (Sed), biofilter tank (Bio), and protein skimmer (Ozo; also used as an ozone reaction chamber) of twin RAS operating in parallel (one for each fish species). Our results revealed pronounced differences in bacterial community composition between turbot and sole RAS, suggesting that in the systems studied there is a strong species-specific effect on water bacterial communities. Proteobacteria was the most abundant phylum in the water supply and all RAS compartments. Other important taxonomic groups included the phylum Bacteriodetes. The saltwater supplied displayed a markedly lower richness and appeared to have very little influence on bacterial composition. The following potentially pathogenic species were detected: Photobacterium damselae in turbot (all compartments), Tenacibaculum discolor in turbot and sole (all compartments), Tenacibaculum soleae in turbot (all compartments) and sole (Pro, Sed and Bio), and Serratia marcescens in turbot (Sup, Sed, Bio and Ozo) and sole (only Sed) RAS. Despite the presence of these pathogens, no symptomatic fish were observed. Although we were able to identify potential pathogens, this approach should be employed with caution when monitoring aquaculture systems, as the required phylogenetic resolution for reliable identification of pathogens may not always be possible to achieve when employing 16S rRNA gene fragments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.