Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24278025›Full record

Trial reportPLoS pathogens2013

Killer bee molecules: antimicrobial peptides as effector molecules to target sporogonic stages of Plasmodium.

Victoria Carter, Ann Underhill, Ibrahima Baber, Lakamy Sylla, Mounirou Baby, Isabelle Larget-Thiery, Agnès Zettor, Catherine Bourgouin, Ulo Langel, Ingrid Faye and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS pathogens, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Isolation of Potato Endophytes and Screening ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Victoria CarterCentre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, School of Life Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Ann Underhill
Ibrahima Baber
Lakamy Sylla
Mounirou Baby
Isabelle Larget-Thiery
Agnès Zettor
Catherine Bourgouin
Ulo Langel
Ingrid Faye
Laszlo Otvos
John D Wade
Mamadou B Coulibaly
Sekou F Traore
Frederic Tripet
Paul Eggleston
Hilary Hurd
Keele University · GBUniversité des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako · MLInstitut Pasteur · FRStockholm University · SECentre Pour le Développement des Vaccins-Mali · MLTemple University · USUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 084582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new generation of strategies is evolving that aim to block malaria transmission by employing genetically modified vectors or mosquito pathogens or symbionts that express anti-parasite molecules. Whilst transgenic technologies have advanced rapidly, there is still a paucity of effector molecules with potent anti-malaria activity whose expression does not cause detrimental effects on mosquito fitness. Our objective was to examine a wide range of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) for their toxic effects on Plasmodium and anopheline mosquitoes. Specifically targeting early sporogonic stages, we initially screened AMPs for toxicity against a mosquito cell line and P. berghei ookinetes. Promising candidate AMPs were fed to mosquitoes to monitor adverse fitness effects, and their efficacy in blocking rodent malaria infection in Anopheles stephensi was assessed. This was followed by tests to determine their activity against P. falciparum in An. gambiae, initially using laboratory cultures to infect mosquitoes, then culminating in preliminary assays in the field using gametocytes and mosquitoes collected from the same area in Mali, West Africa. From a range of 33 molecules, six AMPs able to block Plasmodium development were identified: Anoplin, Duramycin, Mastoparan X, Melittin, TP10 and Vida3. With the exception of Anoplin and Mastoparan X, these AMPs were also toxic to an An. gambiae cell line at a concentration of 25 µM. However, when tested in mosquito blood feeds, they did not reduce mosquito longevity or egg production at concentrations of 50 µM. Peptides effective against cultured ookinetes were less effective when tested in vivo and differences in efficacy against P. berghei and P. falciparum were seen. From the range of molecules tested, the majority of effective AMPs were derived from bee/wasp venoms.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBee VenomsInsect ProteinsOocystsPlasmodium bergheiPlasmodium falciparumAnimalsAnophelesBeesCell LineFemaleHumansMalaria, FalciparumMaleMiceAntimalarialsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBee VenomsInsect Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24278025
PMCPMC3836994
OpenAlexW2128341071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.