ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
Genetic architecture promotes the evolution and maintenance of cooperation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forward-in-time simulation of chromosomal rearrangements: The invisible backbone that sustains long-term adaptation.Molecular ecology · 2024Article
- Enhanced metabolic entanglement emerges during the evolution of an interkingdom microbial community.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Evolution of genome fragility enables microbial division of labor.Molecular systems biology · 2023Article
- Cooperation loci are more pleiotropic than private loci in the bacteriumProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Article
- Overlapping genes in natural and engineered genomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
- Engineering gene overlaps to sustain genetic constructs in vivo.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Ten recent insights for our understanding of cooperation.Nature ecology & evolution · 2021Review
- Article
- In silico bacteria evolve robust cooperaion via complex quorum-sensing strategies.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Adapting the engine to the fuel: mutator populations can reduce the mutational load by reorganizing their genome structure.BMC evolutionary biology · 2019Article
- Pleiotropy, cooperation, and the social evolution of genetic architecture.PLoS biology · 2018Article
- Beware batch culture: Seasonality and niche construction predicted to favor bacterial adaptive diversification.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Genetically integrated traits and rugged adaptive landscapes in digital organisms.BMC evolutionary biology · 2015Article
- Shape matters: lifecycle of cooperative patches promotes cooperation in bulky populations.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When cooperation has a direct cost and an indirect benefit, a selfish behavior is more likely to be selected for than an altruistic one. Kin and group selection do provide evolutionary explanations for the stability of cooperation in nature, but we still lack the full understanding of the genomic mechanisms that can prevent cheater invasion. In our study we used Aevol, an agent-based, in silico genomic platform to evolve populations of digital organisms that compete, reproduce, and cooperate by secreting a public good for tens of thousands of generations. We found that cooperating individuals may share a phenotype, defined as the amount of public good produced, but have very different abilities to resist cheater invasion. To understand the underlying genetic differences between cooperator types, we performed bio-inspired genomics analyses of our digital organisms by recording and comparing the locations of metabolic and secretion genes, as well as the relevant promoters and terminators. Association between metabolic and secretion genes (promoter sharing, overlap via frame shift or sense-antisense encoding) was characteristic for populations with robust cooperation and was more likely to evolve when secretion was costly. In mutational analysis experiments, we demonstrated the potential evolutionary consequences of the genetic association by performing a large number of mutations and measuring their phenotypic and fitness effects. The non-cooperating mutants arising from the individuals with genetic association were more likely to have metabolic deleterious mutations that eventually lead to selection eliminating such mutants from the population due to the accompanying fitness decrease. Effectively, cooperation evolved to be protected and robust to mutations through entangled genetic architecture. Our results confirm the importance of second-order selection on evolutionary outcomes, uncover an important genetic mechanism for the evolution and maintenance of cooperation, and suggest promising methods for preventing gene loss in synthetically engineered organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.