ArticleScience and engineering ethics2013
Editors' overview perspectives on teaching social responsibility to students in science and engineering.
Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Case Study in Arts-Informed Ethics Education in the Nuclear and Radiological Sciences.Science and engineering ethics · 2025Article
- Promoting engineering students' social responsibility and willingness to act on socioscientific issues.International journal of STEM education · 2023Article
- Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of Colombian Companies as Perceived by Industrial Engineering Students.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Article
- Guiding Engineering Student Teams' Ethics Discussions with Peer Advising.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Article
- Engineers' Moral Responsibility: A Confucian Perspective.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Article
- Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- Teaching Engineering Ethics to PhD Students: A Berkeley-Delft Initiative : Commentary on "Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics".Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- The Survival Imperative : Commentary on "Whither the University? Universities of Technology and the Problem of Institutional Purpose".Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- Engineering Ethics Education: A Comparative Study of Japan and Malaysia.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- The Roles of Implicit Understanding of Engineering Ethics in Student Teams' Discussion.Science and engineering ethics · 2017Article
- Engineering Students' Views of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study from Petroleum Engineering.Science and engineering ethics · 2017Article
- Stakeholder Views of Nanosilver Linings: Macroethics Education and Automated Text Analysis Through Participatory Governance Role Play in a Workshop Format.Science and engineering ethics · 2017Article
- Strategies for Teaching Professional Ethics to IT Engineering Degree Students and Evaluating the Result.Science and engineering ethics · 2017Article
- Scientists' Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research.Science and engineering ethics · 2016Article
- Design and Development of a Course in Professionalism and Ethics for CDIO Curriculum in China.Science and engineering ethics · 2015Article
- Second-Guessing Scientists and Engineers: Post Hoc Criticism and the Reform of Practice in Green Chemistry and Engineering.Science and engineering ethics · 2015Article
- Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education.Science and engineering ethics · 2015Article
- Socially responsible science is more than "good science".Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2014Article
- Preparing to understand and use science in the real world: interdisciplinary study concentrations at the Technical University of Darmstadt.Science and engineering ethics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global society is facing formidable current and future problems that threaten the prospects for justice and peace, sustainability, and the well-being of humanity both now and in the future. Many of these problems are related to science and technology and to how they function in the world. If the social responsibility of scientists and engineers implies a duty to safeguard or promote a peaceful, just and sustainable world society, then science and engineering education should empower students to fulfil this responsibility. The contributions to this special issue present European examples of teaching social responsibility to students in science and engineering, and provide examples and discussion of how this teaching can be promoted, and of obstacles that are encountered. Speaking generally, education aimed at preparing future scientists and engineers for social responsibility is presently very limited and seemingly insufficient in view of the enormous ethical and social problems that are associated with current science and technology. Although many social, political and professional organisations have expressed the need for the provision of teaching for social responsibility, important and persistent barriers stand in the way of its sustained development. What is needed are both bottom-up teaching initiatives from individuals or groups of academic teachers, and top-down support to secure appropriate embedding in the university. Often the latter is lacking or inadequate. Educational policies at the national or international level, such as the Bologna agreements in Europe, can be an opportunity for introducing teaching for social responsibility. However, frequently no or only limited positive effect of such policies can be discerned. Existing accreditation and evaluation mechanisms do not guarantee appropriate attention to teaching for social responsibility, because, in their current form, they provide no guarantee that the curricula pay sufficient attention to teaching goals that are desirable for society as a whole.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24277690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.