Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24277643›Full record

ArticleBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2014

DNA methylation reprogramming in cancer: does it act by re-configuring the binding landscape of Polycomb repressive complexes?

James P Reddington, Duncan Sproul, Richard R Meehan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. LncRNA-mediated DNA methylation: an emerging mechanism in cancer and beyond.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Aging mechanisms-A perspective mostly fromAdvanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James P ReddingtonMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Duncan Sproul
Richard R Meehan
Institute of Genetics and Cancer · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilBreast Cancer Now 2012NOVSP15Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127574433Medical Research Council MC_U127574433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation is a repressive epigenetic mark vital for normal development. Recent studies have uncovered an unexpected role for the DNA methylome in ensuring the correct targeting of the Polycomb repressive complexes throughout the genome. Here, we discuss the implications of these findings for cancer, where DNA methylation patterns are widely reprogrammed. We speculate that cancer-associated reprogramming of the DNA methylome leads to an altered Polycomb binding landscape, influencing gene expression by multiple modes. As the Polycomb system is responsible for the regulation of genes with key roles in cell fate decisions and cell cycle regulation, DNA methylation induced Polycomb mis-targeting could directly drive carcinogenesis and disease progression.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticHumansNeoplasmsPolycomb-Group ProteinsPolycomb-Group Proteinscancer epigeneticsDNA methylationepigenomicsH3K27me3Polycombreprogramming

Identifiers

PMID24277643
PMCPMC4225474
OpenAlexW1564886721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.