ReviewPlant cell reports2014
Targeted genome modification technologies and their applications in crop improvements.
Review in Plant cell reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 188 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome editing in maize and sorghum: A comprehensive review of CRISPR/Cas9 and emerging technologies.The plant genome · 2025Review
- Integrating physiological and multi-omics methods to elucidate heat stress tolerance for sustainable rice production.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing Agriculture: Harnessing CRISPR/Cas9 for Crop Enhancement.Indian journal of microbiology · 2024Review
- An Overview of Targeted Genome Editing Strategies for Reducing the Biosynthesis of Phytic Acid: an Anti-nutrient in Crop Plants.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- Advancements in genome editing tools for genetic studies and crop improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Factors affecting the cleavage efficiency of the CRISPR-Cas9 system.Animal cells and systems · 2024Review
- Putting CRISPR-Cas system in action: a golden window for efficient and precise genome editing for crop improvement.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- Genome Editing and Improvement of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- From Transgenesis to Genome Editing in Crop Improvement: Applications, Marketing, and Legal Issues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Combination of Hairy Root and Whole-Plant Transformation Protocols to Achieve Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Soybean.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Targeted genome editing in polyploids: lessons fromFrontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Genetics, genomics, and breeding of black gram [Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Current insights and advances into plant male sterility: new precision breeding technology based on genome editing applications.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Underutilized legumes: nutrient status and advanced breeding approaches for qualitative and quantitative enhancement.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Review
- Validation of Promoters and Codon Optimization on CRISPR/Cas9-Engineered Jurkat Cells Stably Expressing αRep4E3 for Interfering with HIV-1 Replication.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- CRISPR-Based Genome Editing: Advancements and Opportunities for Rice Improvement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Review
- Optimization of T-DNA configuration with UBIQUITIN10 promoters and tRNA-sgRNA complexes promotes highly efficient genome editing in allotetraploid tobacco.Plant cell reports · 2022Article
- A Review of Erucic Acid Production in Brassicaceae Oilseeds: Progress and Prospects for the Genetic Engineering of High and Low-Erucic Acid Rapeseeds (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Progress of Genomics-Driven Approaches for Sustaining Underutilized Legume Crops in the Post-Genomic Era.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in genome engineering indicate that innovative crops developed by targeted genome modification (TGM) using site-specific nucleases (SSNs) have the potential to avoid the regulatory issues raised by genetically modified organisms. These powerful SSNs tools, comprising zinc-finger nucleases, transcription activator-like effector nucleases, and clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated systems, enable precise genome engineering by introducing DNA double-strand breaks that subsequently trigger DNA repair pathways involving either non-homologous end-joining or homologous recombination. Here, we review developments in genome-editing tools, summarize their applications in crop organisms, and discuss future prospects. We also highlight the ability of these tools to create non-transgenic TGM plants for next-generation crop breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.