Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24277023›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Predictive value of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swab PCR assay for MRSA pneumonia.

Benjamin Dangerfield, Andrew Chung, Brandon Webb, Maria Teresa Seville

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06238297 (Rapid De-escalation of Anti-MRSA Therapy Guided by S. Aureus Nares Screening in Case of Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06238297 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Rapid De-escalation of Anti-MRSA Therapy Guided by S. Aureus Nares Screening in Case of Pneumonia (SNAP Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Bari Aldo MoroRan2024 to 2025Enrolled76ConditionsPneumonia, BacterialArmsMRSA nasal swab based de-escalation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Quality Improvement Project to Increase Pharmacist-Initiated Methicillin ResistantThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Towards a holistic approach to pulmonary infections. Insights from the Sixth Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2024.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Implementation of an automated methicillin-resistantAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  16. Retrospective, single-center assessment of a pharmacist-led anti-methicillin-resistantAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin DangerfieldDivision of Internal Medicine, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Andrew Chung
Brandon Webb
Maria Teresa Seville
Mayo Clinic · USMaricopa Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with poor outcomes and frequently merits empirical antibiotic consideration despite its relatively low incidence. Nasal colonization with MRSA is associated with clinical MRSA infection and can be reliably detected using the nasal swab PCR assay. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the nasal swab MRSA PCR in predicting MRSA pneumonia. A retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary care center from January 2009 to July 2011. All patients with confirmed pneumonia who had both a nasal swab MRSA PCR test and a bacterial culture within predefined time intervals were included in the study. These data were used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for clinically confirmed MRSA pneumonia. Four hundred thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of cases were classified as either health care-associated (HCAP) (54.7%) or community-acquired (CAP) (34%) pneumonia. MRSA nasal PCR was positive in 62 (14.3%) cases. MRSA pneumonia was confirmed by culture in 25 (5.7%) cases. The MRSA PCR assay demonstrated 88.0% sensitivity and 90.1% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 35.4% and a negative predictive value of 99.2%. In patients with pneumonia, the MRSA PCR nasal swab has a poor positive predictive value but an excellent negative predictive value for MRSA pneumonia in populations with low MRSA pneumonia incidence. In cases of culture-negative pneumonia where initial empirical antibiotics include an MRSA-active agent, a negative MRSA PCR swab can be reasonably used to guide antibiotic de-escalation.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Dosage CalculationsFemaleHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNasal CavityPneumonia, StaphylococcalPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID24277023
PMCPMC3910879
OpenAlexW2125700744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.