Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24276239›Full record

Trial reportOncogene2014

Low CHD5 expression activates the DNA damage response and predicts poor outcome in patients undergoing adjuvant therapy for resected pancreatic cancer.

W A Hall, A V Petrova, L E Colbert, C W Hardy, S B Fisher, B Saka, J W Shelton, M D Warren, B G Pantazides, K Gandhi and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncogene, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The Emerging Role of Chromatin Remodeling Complexes in Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Pan-Cancer Analysis Identifies CHD5 as a Potential Biomarker for Glioma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

W A HallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
A V PetrovaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
L E ColbertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
C W HardyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
S B FisherDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
B SakaDepartment of Pathology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J W SheltonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
M D WarrenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
B G PantazidesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
K GandhiBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J KowalskiBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
D A Kooby1] Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA [2] Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
B F El-RayesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
C A StaleyDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
N Volkan AdsayDepartment of Pathology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
W J CurranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J C LandryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
S K MaithelDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
D S YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · USVeterans Health Administration · USWinship Cancer Institute

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
Generic Fluorescent HTS Assay for Kinases and ATPasesR44CA110535 · NCI · BELLBROOK LABS, LLC · PI LOWERY, ROBERT G · 2006 to 2007
$648k
Generic Fluorescent HTS Assay for Protein KinasesR43CA110535 · NCI · BELLBROOK LABS, LLC · PI LOWERY, ROBERT G · 2005 to 2005
$173k
NCATS NIH HHS ULL TR000454NCI NIH HHS CA110535PHS HHS TLLTR000456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) promotes genome integrity and serves as a cancer barrier in precancerous lesions but paradoxically may promote cancer survival. Genes that activate the DDR when dysregulated could function as useful biomarkers for outcome in cancer patients. Using a siRNA screen in human pancreatic cancer cells, we identified the CHD5 tumor suppressor as a gene, which, when silenced, activates the DDR. We evaluated the relationship of CHD5 expression with DDR activation in human pancreatic cancer cells and the association of CHD5 expression in 80 patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) by immunohistochemical analysis with clinical outcome. CHD5 depletion and low CHD5 expression in human pancreatic cancer cells lead to increased H2AX-Ser139 and CHK2-Thr68 phosphorylation and accumulation into nuclear foci. On Kaplan-Meier log-rank survival analysis, patients with low CHD5 expression had a median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 5.3 vs 15.4 months for patients with high CHD5 expression (P=0.03). In 59 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, low CHD5 expression was associated with decreased RFS (4.5 vs 16.3 months; P=0.001) and overall survival (OS) (7.2 vs 21.6 months; P=0.003). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, low CHD5 expression remained associated with worse OS (HR: 3.187 (95% CI: 1.49-6.81); P=0.003) in patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, low CHD5 expression activates the DDR and predicts for worse OS in patients with resected PAC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings support a model in which dysregulated expression of tumor suppressor genes that induce DDR activation can be utilized as biomarkers for poor outcome.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalDNA DamageDNA HelicasesFemaleGemcitabineGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, Tumor SuppressorHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateBiomarkers, TumorCHD5 protein, humanDeoxycytidineDNA HelicasesGemcitabineNerve Tissue Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24276239
OpenAlexW2080495917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.