Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24275496›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2014

CyanoBase and RhizoBase: databases of manually curated annotations for cyanobacterial and rhizobial genomes.

Takatomo Fujisawa, Shinobu Okamoto, Toshiaki Katayama, Mitsuteru Nakao, Hidehisa Yoshimura, Hiromi Kajiya-Kanegae, Sumiko Yamamoto, Chiyoko Yano, Yuka Yanaka, Hiroko Maita and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Acclimation and stress response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Genome sequencing of the NIES Cyanobacteria collection with a focus on the heterocyst-forming clade.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Transcriptomic Changes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  6. Deletion ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Complex Transcriptional Response ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Takatomo FujisawaCenter for Information Biology, National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Yata, Mishima 411-8540, Japan, Database Center for Life Science, Research Organization of Information and Systems, 2-11-16 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kyoto Sangyo University, Motoyama, Kamigamo, Kita-Ku, Kyoto 603-8555, Japan and Kazusa DNA Research Institute, 2-6-7 Kazusa-Kamatari, Kisarazu 292-0818, Japan.
Shinobu Okamoto
Toshiaki Katayama
Mitsuteru Nakao
Hidehisa Yoshimura
Hiromi Kajiya-Kanegae
Sumiko Yamamoto
Chiyoko Yano
Yuka Yanaka
Hiroko Maita
Takakazu Kaneko
Satoshi Tabata
Yasukazu Nakamura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand newly sequenced genomes of closely related species, comprehensively curated reference genome databases are becoming increasingly important. We have extended CyanoBase (http://genome.microbedb.jp/cyanobase), a genome database for cyanobacteria, and newly developed RhizoBase (http://genome.microbedb.jp/rhizobase), a genome database for rhizobia, nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with leguminous plants. Both databases focus on the representation and reusability of reference genome annotations, which are continuously updated by manual curation. Domain experts have extracted names, products and functions of each gene reported in the literature. To ensure effectiveness of this procedure, we developed the TogoAnnotation system offering a web-based user interface and a uniform storage of annotations for the curators of the CyanoBase and RhizoBase databases. The number of references investigated for CyanoBase increased from 2260 in our previous report to 5285, and for RhizoBase, we perused 1216 references. The results of these intensive annotations are displayed on the GeneView pages of each database. Advanced users can also retrieve this information through the representational state transfer-based web application programming interface in an automated manner.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenome, BacterialAlphaproteobacteriaBradyrhizobiumCyanobacteriaGenes, BacterialInternetMesorhizobiumMolecular Sequence AnnotationRhizobiumSinorhizobium

Identifiers

PMID24275496
PMCPMC3965071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.