Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24275329›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2014

A phenotypic analysis shows that eosinophilic esophagitis is a progressive fibrostenotic disease.

Evan S Dellon, Hannah P Kim, Sarah L W Sperry, David A Rybnicek, John T Woosley, Nicholas J Shaheen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05309590 (Prospective Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Low-Dose Topical Steroids in Maintaining Histologic Remission of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 273 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
273citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
24.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05309590 active not recruitingnot on this map

Prospective Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Low-Dose Topical Steroids in Maintaining Histologic Remission of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoRan2014 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsEosinophilic EsophagitisArmsDose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

273 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 485 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. A Newly Proposed Severity Index for Eosinophilic Esophagitis is Associated With Baseline Clinical Features and Successful Treatment Response.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Rapid Recurrence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity After Successful Treatment in the Observation Phase of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2020
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evan S DellonCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Hannah P KimCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Sarah L W SperryCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
David A RybnicekCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
John T WoosleyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Nicholas J ShaheenCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Risk Factors and Biomarkers for Diagnosis & Treatment of Eosinophilic EsophagitisK23DK090073 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DELLON, EVAN SAMUEL · 2011 to 2013
$541k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK090073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhenotypes of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are not well-characterized.

objectiveTo describe clinical features of patients with EoE with predefined phenotypes, determine predictors of these phenotypes, and make inferences about the natural history of EoE.

designRetrospective study.

settingTertiary-care center. PATIENTS: Incident EoE cases from 2001 to 2011 that met consensus diagnostic guidelines.

interventionReview of records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Endoscopic phenotypes, including fibrostenotic, inflammatory, or mixed. Other groups of clinical characteristics examined included atopy, level of esophageal eosinophilia, and age of symptom onset. Multinomial logistic regression assessed predictors of phenotype status.

resultsOf 379 cases of EoE identified, there were no significant phenotypic differences by atopic status or level of eosinophilia. Those with the inflammatory phenotype were more likely to be younger than those with mixed or fibrostenotic (13 vs 29 vs 39 years, respectively; P < .001) and less likely to have dysphagia, food impaction, and esophageal dilation (P < .001 for all). The mean symptom length before diagnosis was shorter for inflammatory (5 vs 8 vs 8 years; P = .02). After multivariate analysis, age and dysphagia independently predicted phenotype. The odds ratio (OR) for fibrostenosis for each 10-year increase in age was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.7-2.7). The OR for dysphagia was 7.0 (95% CI, 2.6-18.6). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective, single-center study.

conclusionIn this large EoE cohort, the likelihood of fibrostenotic disease increased markedly with age. For every 10-year increase in age, the odds of having a fibrostenotic EoE phenotype more than doubled. This association suggests that the natural history of EoE is a progression from an inflammatory to a fibrostenotic disease.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDisease ProgressionEosinophilic EsophagitisEsophageal StenosisEsophagusFemaleFibrosisHumansInfantMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24275329
PMCPMC4599711
OpenAlexW2078475980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.