Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24274806›Full record

Trial reportHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2014

Coaction in multiple behavior change interventions: consistency across multiple studies on weight management and obesity prevention.

Sara S Johnson, Andrea L Paiva, Leanne Mauriello, James O Prochaska, Colleen Redding, Wayne F Velicer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acute exercise-induced changes in motivation and behavioral expectation for quitting smoking as predictors of smoking behavior in women.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara S JohnsonResearch and Product Development, Pro-Change Behavior Systems, Inc.
Andrea L PaivaCancer Prevention Research Center, University of Rhode Island.
Leanne MaurielloResearch and Product Development, Pro-Change Behavior Systems, Inc.
James O ProchaskaCancer Prevention Research Center, University of Rhode Island.
Colleen ReddingCancer Prevention Research Center, University of Rhode Island.
Wayne F VelicerCancer Prevention Research Center, University of Rhode Island.

Funding

Tailored Interventions to Prevent Substance AbuseR01DA020112 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI VELICER, WAYNE F · 2006 to 2010
$2.9M
Individualized Expert Systems for Weight ManagementR44HL070549 · NHLBI · PRO-CHANGE BEHAVIOR SYSTEMS, INC. · PI JOHNSON, SARA S · 2002 to 2005
$1.1M
Multi-media Obesity Prevention Program for AdolescentsR44HL074482 · NHLBI · PRO-CHANGE BEHAVIOR SYSTEMS, INC. · PI MAURIELLO, LEANNE MARIE · 2005 to 2007
$989k
NHLBI NIH HHS R44 HL070549NHLBI NIH HHS R44 HL074482NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020112NIDA NIH HHS R01DA020112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCoaction refers to the extent to which taking action on one behavior increases the odds of taking action on a second behavior. This integrative study examines the generalization of coaction in three studies on weight-related behaviors.

methodData from three randomized trials of tailored interventions (n = 1,277, n = 1,800, and n = 6,000) were examined to determine if coaction of behavior change occurred differentially in treatment and control groups. In each analysis, the likelihood of progressing to the Action or Maintenance stages for the target behaviors was evaluated using logistic regression.

resultsDespite differences in populations, targeted behaviors, levels of tailoring in interventions, and timing of follow-up assessments, 17 out of 24 (70.8%) logistic regressions revealed significant coaction in the treatment group as opposed to only three out of 24 (12.5%) in the control condition. In 23/24 analyses, coaction of behavior change was larger on an absolute basis in the treatment group. Individuals in the treatment group progressing to Action/Maintenance for one behavior were 1.4-5 times more likely to make progress on another behavior compared to those in the treatment group who did not make such progress on the first behavior.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that despite considerable variability in study design, coaction reliably occurs more in the presence of Transtheoretical-Model based multiple behavior change interventions. Additional studies are needed to replicate these results in other behavioral areas and to examine the predictors of differential coaction. The ability to consistently create coaction within multiple behavior interventions can increase the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of multiple behavior change interventions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBehavior TherapyChildFemaleHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalObesityProgram EvaluationWeight Reduction Programs

Identifiers

PMID24274806
PMCPMC4083557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.