Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24274589›Full record

Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2013

Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711].

Sandra van Brunschot, Janneke van Grinsven, Rogier P Voermans, Olaf J Bakker, Marc G H Besselink, Marja A Boermeester, Thomas L Bollen, Koop Bosscha, Stefan A Bouwense, Marco J Bruno and 34 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05601687 (Endoscopic Step-up Approach vs Aggressive Debridement of Large Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis - A Single-center, Open-label, Randomized, Superiority Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05601687 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Endoscopic Step-up Approach vs Aggressive Debridement of Large Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis - A Single-center, Open-label, Randomized, Superiority Trial (ACCELERATE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCopenhagen University Hospital, HvidovreRan2022 to 2025Enrolled25ConditionsPancreatic Necrosis, Pancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingArmsDirect Endoscopic Necrosectomy, Step-up Approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Interventions for necrotising pancreatitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

44 authors.

Sandra van BrunschotDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.vanbrunschot@pancreatitis.nl.
Janneke van Grinsven
Rogier P Voermans
Olaf J Bakker
Marc G H Besselink
Marja A Boermeester
Thomas L Bollen
Koop Bosscha
Stefan A Bouwense
Marco J Bruno
Vincent C Cappendijk
Esther C Consten
Cornelis H Dejong
Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
Casper H van Eijck
G Willemien Erkelens
Harry van Goor
Mohammed Hadithi
Jan-Willem Haveman
Sijbrand H Hofker
Jeroen J M Jansen
Johan S Laméris
Krijn P van Lienden
Eric R Manusama
Maarten A Meijssen
Chris J Mulder
Vincent B Nieuwenhuis
Jan-Werner Poley
Rogier J de Ridder
Camiel Rosman
Alexander F Schaapherder
Joris J Scheepers
Erik J Schoon
Tom Seerden
B W Marcel Spanier
Jan Willem A Straathof
Robin Timmer
Niels G Venneman
Frank P Vleggaar
Ben J Witteman
Hein G Gooszen
Hjalmar C van Santvoort
Paul Fockens
Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfected necrotising pancreatitis is a potentially lethal disease that nearly always requires intervention. Traditionally, primary open necrosectomy has been the treatment of choice. In recent years, the surgical step-up approach, consisting of percutaneous catheter drainage followed, if necessary, by (minimally invasive) surgical necrosectomy has become the standard of care. A promising minimally invasive alternative is the endoscopic transluminal step-up approach. This approach consists of endoscopic transluminal drainage followed, if necessary, by endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy. We hypothesise that the less invasive endoscopic step-up approach is superior to the surgical step-up approach in terms of clinical and economic outcomes. METHODS/

designThe TENSION trial is a randomised controlled, parallel-group superiority multicenter trial. Patients with (suspected) infected necrotising pancreatitis with an indication for intervention and in whom both treatment modalities are deemed possible, will be randomised to either an endoscopic transluminal or a surgical step-up approach. During a 4 year study period, 98 patients will be enrolled from 24 hospitals of the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. The primary endpoint is a composite of death and major complications within 6 months following randomisation. Secondary endpoints include complications such as pancreaticocutaneous fistula, exocrine or endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, need for additional radiological, endoscopic or surgical intervention, the need for necrosectomy after drainage, the number of (re-)interventions, quality of life, and total direct and indirect costs. DISCUSSION: The TENSION trial will answer the question whether an endoscopic step-up approach reduces the combined primary endpoint of death and major complications, as well as hospital stay and related costs compared with a surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsDebridementDrainageEndoscopyHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNetherlandsPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24274589
PMCPMC4222267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.