Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24274534›Full record

ArticleCarbohydrate polymers2014

Comparative evaluation of chitosan, cellulose acetate, and polyethersulfone nanofiber scaffolds for neural differentiation.

Jian Du, Elaine Tan, Hyo Jun Kim, Allen Zhang, Rahul Bhattacharya, Kevin J Yarema

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Carbohydrate polymers, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Red Swamp Crayfish (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sustainable Natural Bio-Origin Materials for Future Flexible Devices.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Modifications of cellulose-based biomaterials for biomedical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Physical Cues of Matrices Reeducate Nerve Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cellulose Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jian DuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and the Translational Tissue Engineering Center, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Elaine Tan
Hyo Jun Kim
Allen Zhang
Rahul Bhattacharya
Kevin J Yarema

Funding

Engineering a Carbohydrate-Biomaterial Interface for Control of Wnt Signaling andR01EB005692 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI YAREMA, KEVIN J · 2007 to 2010
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB 005692NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on accumulating evidence that the 3D topography and the chemical features of a growth surface influence neuronal differentiation, we combined these two features by evaluating the cytotoxicity, proliferation, and differentiation of the rat PC12 line and human neural stem cells (hNSCs) on chitosan (CS), cellulose acetate (CA), and polyethersulfone (PES)-derived electrospun nanofibers that had similar diameters, centered in the 200-500 nm range. None of the nanofibrous materials were cytotoxic compared to 2D (e.g., flat surface) controls; however, proliferation generally was inhibited on the nanofibrous scaffolds although to a lesser extent on the polysaccharide-derived materials compared to PES. In an exception to the trend toward slower growth on the 3D substrates, hNSCs differentiated on the CS nanofibers proliferated faster than the 2D controls and both cell types showed enhanced indication of neuronal differentiation on the CS scaffolds. Together, these results demonstrate beneficial attributes of CS for neural tissue engineering when this polysaccharide is used in the context of the defined 3D topography found in electrospun nanofibers.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCelluloseChitosanElectrochemical TechniquesGene ExpressionHumansMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNanofibersNestinNeural Stem CellsacetylcelluloseBiomarkersCelluloseChitosanMAP2 protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNES protein, humanNestinpolyether sulfonePolymersSulfonesTubulinElectrospun nanofibersHuman neural stem cellsPolysaccharidesRat PC12 cellsTissue engineering scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID24274534
PMCPMC3856206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.