Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24273704›Full record

ArticleHearing, balance and communication2013

CENTRAL AUDTIORY DEVELOPMENT IN CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS: CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF THE P1 CAEP BIOMARKER IN HEARING-IMPAIRED CHILDREN WITH MULTIPLE DISABILITIES.

Anu Sharma, Hannah Glick, Julia Campbell, Allison Biever

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing, balance and communication, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03887182 (Contribution of Functional MRI in Assessment of Auditory Processing Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03887182 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Contribution of Functional MRI in Assessment of Auditory Processing Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2020 to 2023Enrolled45ConditionsAuditory Processing DisordersArmsfunctional MRI, Automated Cortical Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential, whole exome sequencing, Standard Cortical Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential, multidisciplinary consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Developmental and cross-modal plasticity in deafness: evidence from the P1 and N1 event related potentials in cochlear implanted children.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anu SharmaDept. of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, 2501 Kittredge Loop Road 409 UCB Boulder, CO 80309.
Hannah Glick
Julia Campbell
Allison Biever
University of Colorado Boulder · USRocky Mountain MS Center · US

Funding

Institutional Training in Otolaryngology ResearchT32DC012280 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Yuri Agrawal, Sue C. Kinnamon · 2013 to 2026
$3.4M
Central Auditory Development in Hearing Impaired InfantsR01DC006257 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI SHARMA, ANU · 2004 to 2009
$2.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006257NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC012280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFirst, we review the development and plasticity of the central auditory pathways in infants and children with hearing loss who are fitted with cochlear implants (CIs). Second, we describe case studies demonstrating the clinical utility of the P1 central auditory evoked potential (CAEP) for evaluating cortical auditory maturation in the rapidly increasing number of cochlear-implanted children who have multiple disabilities. STUDY

designChildren who receive CIs provide a platform to examine the trajectories of deprivation-induced and experience-dependent plasticity in the central auditory system. We review the evidence for, and time limits of sensitive periods for cortical auditory maturation framing an optimal period for cochlear implantation. Finally, we evaluate the use of the P1 biomarker as an objective assessment tool in the special case of children with multiple disabilities.

resultsThe P1 response was useful in assessing central auditory maturation in patients with CHARGE association, ANSD, and Pallister-Killian Syndrome concomitant with hearing loss.

conclusionThe presence of co-existing disabilities in addition to hearing loss poses unique challenges regarding both pre-intervention evaluation and post-intervention rehabilitation for children with multiple disabilities. When combined with a standard audiological test battery, the P1 CAEP biomarker has a useful role in objectively evaluating the maturation of central auditory pathways to determine the effectiveness of various intervention strategies in hearing-impaired children with multiple disabilities.

Indexed as

cochlear implantmultiple disabilitiesP1 Cortical auditory evoked potentialsensitive period

Identifiers

PMID24273704
PMCPMC3833866
OpenAlexW2155079726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.