ArticleNano today2013
High-resolution, serial intravital microscopic imaging of nanoparticle delivery and targeting in a small animal tumor model.
Article in Nano today, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravital microscopy for nanomedicine: investigating nanoparticle-tissue interactions in the native state.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Global trends and emerging research in nanotechnology for esophageal cancer: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Intravital Microscopy Reveals Endothelial Transcytosis Contributing to Significant Tumor Accumulation of Albumin Nanoparticles.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- The Role of Optical Imaging in Translational Nanomedicine.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Ultra-selective carbon nanotubes for photoacoustic imaging of inflamed atherosclerotic plaques.Advanced functional materials · 2021Article
- Self-assembled peptide and protein nanostructures for anti-cancer therapy: Targeted delivery, stimuli-responsive devices and immunotherapy.Nano today · 2021Article
- Detection of Estrogen Receptor Alpha and Assessment of Fulvestrant Activity in MCF-7 Tumor Spheroids Using Microfluidics and SERS.Analytical chemistry · 2021Article
- Macrophage-Targeted Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes Stimulate Phagocytosis via pH-dependent Drug Release.Nano research · 2021Article
- Particle tracking microrheology of cancer cells in living subjects.Materials today (Kidlington, England) · 2020Article
- Understanding the in vivo Fate of Advanced Materials by Imaging.Advanced functional materials · 2020Article
- Nanotherapeutic Shots through the Heart of Plaque.ACS nano · 2020Review
- Designing inorganic nanomaterials for vaccines and immunotherapies.Nano today · 2019Article
- Cancer Immunotherapy Getting Brainy: Visualizing the Distinctive CNS Metastatic Niche to Illuminate Therapeutic Resistance.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2017Review
- Imaging the pharmacology of nanomaterials by intravital microscopy: Toward understanding their biological behavior.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2017Review
- Applications of Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes for the Therapy and Diagnosis of Cancer.Polymers · 2017Review
- Biotransport kinetics and intratumoral biodistribution of malonodiserinolamide-derivatized [60]fullerene in a murine model of breast adenocarcinoma.International journal of nanomedicine · 2017Article
- A cooperative polymeric platform for tumor-targeted drug delivery.Chemical science · 2016Article
- Synthetic Nanoparticles for Vaccines and Immunotherapy.Chemical reviews · 2015Review
- Reversibly extracellular pH controlled cellular uptake and photothermal therapy by PEGylated mixed-charge gold nanostars.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoparticles are under active investigation for the detection and treatment of cancer. Yet our understanding of nanoparticle delivery to tumors is limited by our ability to observe the uptake process on its own scale in living subjects. We chose to study single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) because they exhibit among the highest levels of tumor uptake across the wide variety of available nanoparticles. We target them using RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid) peptide which directs them to integrins overexpressed on tumor vasculature and on the surface of some tumor cells (e.g., U87MG as used here). We employ intravital microscopy (IVM) to quantitatively examine the spatiotemporal framework of targeted SWNT uptake in a murine tumor model. IVM provided a dynamic microscale window into nanoparticle circulation, binding to tumor blood vessels, extravasation, binding to tumor cells, and tumor retention. RGD-SWNTs bound to tumor vasculature significantly more than controls (P<0.0001). RGD-SWNTs extravasated similarly compared to control RAD-SWNTs, but post-extravasation we observed as RGD-SWNTs eventually bound to individual tumor cells significantly more than RAD-SWNTs (p<0.0001) over time. RGD-SWNTs and RAD-SWNTs displayed similar signal in tumor for a week, but over time their curves significantly diverged (p<0.001) showing increasing RGD-SWNTs relative to untargeted SWNTs. We uncovered the complex spatiotemporal interplay between these competing uptake mechanisms. Specific uptake was delimited to early (1-6 hours) and late (1-4 weeks) time-points, while non-specific uptake dominated from 6 hours to 1 week. Our analysis revealed critical, quantitative insights into the dynamic, multifaceted mechanisms implicated in ligand-targeted SWNT accumulation in tumor using real-time observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.