ReviewFrontiers in physiology2013
Isolation, characterization, and molecular regulation of muscle stem cells.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic regeneration medicines for muscular dystrophy: progress and challenges in pro-regenerative drug development.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2026Review
- Development of an anti-CDH15/M-cadherin monoclonal antibody CaBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- ZIP13 marks muscle satellite cells and contributes to their quiescent and active phase balance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell Secretome: Potential Applications in Human Infertility Caused by Hormonal Imbalance, External Damage, or Immune Factors.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Single-cell RNA-seq reveals novel interaction between muscle satellite cells and fibro-adipogenic progenitors mediated with FGF7 signalling.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024Article
- Dispase/collagenase cocktail allows for coisolation of satellite cells and fibroadipogenic progenitors from human skeletal muscle.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2024Article
- Division-Independent Differentiation of Muscle Stem Cells During a Growth Stimulus.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2024Article
- Transcriptional reprogramming of skeletal muscle stem cells by the niche environment.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Regulation of muscle stem cell fate.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2022Review
- Mechanisms of cooperative cell-cell interactions in skeletal muscle regeneration.Inflammation and regeneration · 2022Review
- Recent advances in tissue stem cells.Science China. Life sciences · 2021Review
- Comparing the epigenetic landscape in myonuclei purified with a PCM1 antibody from a fast/glycolytic and a slow/oxidative muscle.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Exercise/Resistance Training and Muscle Stem Cells.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021Article
- Stem Cell Aging in Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Article
- Muscle regeneration is disrupted by cancer cachexia without loss of muscle stem cell potential.PloS one · 2018Article
- Skeletal muscle stem cells in comfort and stress.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2018Review
- Rejuvenating stem cells to restore muscle regeneration in aging.F1000Research · 2017Review
- Design, evaluation, and application of engineered skeletal muscle.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2016Review
- A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease 10 (ADAM10) Is Indispensable for Maintenance of the Muscle Satellite Cell Pool.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal muscle has great regenerative capacity which is dependent on muscle stem cells, also known as satellite cells. A loss of satellite cells and/or their function impairs skeletal muscle regeneration and leads to a loss of skeletal muscle power; therefore, the molecular mechanisms for maintaining satellite cells in a quiescent and undifferentiated state are of great interest in skeletal muscle biology. Many studies have demonstrated proteins expressed by satellite cells, including Pax7, M-cadherin, Cxcr4, syndecan3/4, and c-met. To further characterize satellite cells, we established a method to directly isolate satellite cells using a monoclonal antibody, SM/C-2.6. Using SM/C-2.6 and microarrays, we measured the genes expressed in quiescent satellite cells and demonstrated that Hesr3 may complement Hesr1 in generating quiescent satellite cells. Although Hesr1- or Hesr3-single knockout mice show a normal skeletal muscle phenotype, including satellite cells, Hesr1/Hesr3-double knockout mice show a gradual decrease in the number of satellite cells and increase in regenerative defects dependent on satellite cell numbers. We also observed that a mouse's genetic background affects the regenerative capacity of its skeletal muscle and have established a line of DBA/2-background mdx mice that has a much more severe phenotype than the frequently used C57BL/10-mdx mice. The phenotype of DBA/2-mdx mice also seems to depend on the function of satellite cells. In this review, we summarize the methodology of direct isolation, characterization, and molecular regulation of satellite cells based on our results. The relationship between the regenerative capacity of satellite cells and progression of muscular disorders is also summarized. In the last part, we discuss application of the accumulating scientific information on satellite cells to treatment of patients with muscular disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.