ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2013
On conductance-based neural field models.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive investigation of intracortical and corticothalamic models of the alpha rhythm.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Neural Field Continuum Limits and the Structure-Function Partitioning of Cognitive-Emotional Brain Networks.Biology · 2023Review
- Bayesian Modelling of Induced Responses and Neuronal Rhythms.Brain topography · 2019Article
- A neural mass model to predict electrical stimulation evoked responses in human and non-human primate brain.Journal of neural engineering · 2018Article
- Bayesian Optimisation of Large-Scale Biophysical Networks.NeuroImage · 2018Article
- On memories, neural ensembles and mental flexibility.NeuroImage · 2017Article
- Linking canonical microcircuits and neuronal activity: Dynamic causal modelling of laminar recordings.NeuroImage · 2017Article
- Intersubject variability and induced gamma in the visual cortex: DCM with empirical Bayes and neural fields.Human brain mapping · 2016Article
- Extrinsic and Intrinsic Brain Network Connectivity Maintains Cognition across the Lifespan Despite Accelerated Decay of Regional Brain Activation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Article
- Eyes Open on Sleep and Wake: In Vivo to In Silico Neural Networks.Neural plasticity · 2016Review
- Article
- Neural masses and fields: modeling the dynamics of brain activity.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This technical note introduces a conductance-based neural field model that combines biologically realistic synaptic dynamics-based on transmembrane currents-with neural field equations, describing the propagation of spikes over the cortical surface. This model allows for fairly realistic inter-and intra-laminar intrinsic connections that underlie spatiotemporal neuronal dynamics. We focus on the response functions of expected neuronal states (such as depolarization) that generate observed electrophysiological signals (like LFP recordings and EEG). These response functions characterize the model's transfer functions and implicit spectral responses to (uncorrelated) input. Our main finding is that both the evoked responses (impulse response functions) and induced responses (transfer functions) show qualitative differences depending upon whether one uses a neural mass or field model. Furthermore, there are differences between the equivalent convolution and conductance models. Overall, all models reproduce a characteristic increase in frequency, when inhibition was increased by increasing the rate constants of inhibitory populations. However, convolution and conductance-based models showed qualitatively different changes in power, with convolution models showing decreases with increasing inhibition, while conductance models show the opposite effect. These differences suggest that conductance based field models may be important in empirical studies of cortical gain control or pharmacological manipulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.