ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2014
A model-free approach for detecting interactions in genetic association studies.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the risk factors and clustering patterns of periodontitis in patients with different subtypes of diabetes through machine learning and cluster analysis.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- A Belief Degree-Associated Fuzzy Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction Framework for Epistasis Detection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Identification of gene-environment interactions with marginal penalization.Genetic epidemiology · 2020Article
- Robust genetic interaction analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Article
- Iterative sure independence screening EM-Bayesian LASSO algorithm for multi-locus genome-wide association studies.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past few decades, genome-wide association studies analyzed by efficient statistical procedures have successfully identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are associated with complex traits or human diseases. However, due to the overwhelming number of SNPs, most approaches have focused on additive genetic model without genome-wide SNP-SNP interactions. In this study, we propose an efficient statistical procedure in a genetic model-free framework for detecting SNPs exhibiting main genetic effects as well as epistatic interactions. Specifically, the association between phenotype and genotype is characterized by an unknown function to be estimated using nonparametric techniques, and a two-stage non-parametric independence screening procedure is proposed to sequentially identify potentially important main genetic effects and interactions. Finally, the subset of genetic predictors implied by two-stage non-parametric independence screening is analyzed by penalized regressions such as LASSO, and a final model is identified. In this framework, specific genetic model is not assumed and interactions are not only among marginally important SNPs. Therefore, SNPs that are involved in genetic regulatory networks but missed by previous studies are expected to be recognized. In simulation studies, we show that the procedure is computationally efficient and has an outstanding finite sample performance in selecting potential SNPs as well as SNP-SNP interactions. A real data analysis further indicates the importance of epistatic interactions in explaining body mass index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.