Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24273005›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of surgery2014

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for intra-abdominal emergency conditions.

J Bingener, I Ibrahim-zada

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Emergency surgery in the elderly: the balance between function, frailty, fatality and futility.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J BingenerDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
I Ibrahim-zada
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness of Novel Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresK23DK093553 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BINGENER-CASEY, JULIANE · 2012 to 2014
$465k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK093553NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK93553-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient benefits from natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) are of interest in acute-care surgery. This review provides an overview of the historical development of NOTES procedures, and addresses their current uses and limitations for intra-abdominal emergency conditions.

methodsA PubMed search was carried out for articles describing NOTES approaches for appendicectomy, percutaneous gastrostomy, hollow viscus perforation and pancreatic necrosectomy. Pertinent articles were reviewed and data on available outcomes synthesized.

resultsEmergency conditions in surgery tax the patient's cardiovascular and respiratory systems, and fluid and electrolyte balance. The operative intervention itself leads to an inflammatory response and blood loss, thus adding to the physiological stress. NOTES provides a minimally invasive alternative access to the peritoneal cavity, avoiding abdominal wall incisions. A clear advantage to the patient is evident with the implementation of an endoscopic approach to deal with inadvertently displaced percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes and perforated gastroduodenal ulcer. The NOTES approach appears less invasive for patients with infected pancreatic necrosis, in whom it allows surgical debridement and avoidance of open necrosectomy. Transvaginal appendicectomy is the second most frequently performed NOTES procedure after cholecystectomy. The NOTES concept has provided a change in perspective for intramural and transmural endoscopic approaches to iatrogenic perforations during endoscopy.

conclusionNOTES approaches have been implemented in clinical practice over the past decade. Selected techniques offer reduced invasiveness for patients with intra-abdominal emergencies, and may improve outcomes. Steady future development and adoption of NOTES are likely to follow as technology improves and surgeons become comfortable with the approaches.

Indexed as

AppendectomyConversion to Open SurgeryDiverticulitisDuodenal UlcerEmergenciesEmergency TreatmentGastrostomyHumansIntestinal PerforationIntraabdominal InfectionsNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingPeptic Ulcer PerforationReoperationStomach UlcerSurgical Wound Dehiscence

Identifiers

PMID24273005
PMCPMC4032175
OpenAlexW1548041797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.