ReviewJournal of cardiovascular translational research2014
Bridging antiplatelet therapy in patients requiring cardiac and non-cardiac surgery: from bench to bedside.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review and Updates in Regenerative and Personalized Medicine, Preclinical Animal Models, and Clinical Care in Cardiovascular Medicine.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the mainstay of pharmacotherapy after an acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. While patients requiring interruption of DAPT at the time of cardiac or noncardiac surgery face an increased risk of thrombotic complications, the opportunity of continuing DAPT in the perioperative period should be balanced against the risk of bleeding. Tailoring antiplatelet therapy on patient- and surgery-specific characteristics mandates a clear understanding of pharmacodynamic and clinical data on using antithrombotic agents in the perioperative period. This is also important given the introduction of novel antiplatelet agents that are already adopted in practice (prasugrel, ticagrelor) or will likely be adopted in the near future (cangrelor). This article explores the theoretical background and rationale for bridging patients on antiplatelet drugs to their surgical procedure, and provides insights on how patient and procedural characteristics translate into different considerations for the use of antithrombotic agents in the surgical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.