Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24272607›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2014

Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution.

S Atallah, B Martin-Perez, M Albert, T deBeche-Adams, G Nassif, L Hunter, S Larach

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03242187 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

(MansTaTME) Trans-anal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Low Rectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled30ConditionsRectal CancerArmsTrans-anal total mesorectal excision(TaTME), Lap. TME
NCT04015804 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

European Ambispective Cohort of Rectal Cancer Patient Who Underwent Robotic Low Anterior Resection

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2015 to 2025Enrolled833ConditionsRectum CancerArmsClinical database
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 200 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Colorectal cancer: Recent advances in management and treatment.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S AtallahFlorida Hospital, Winter Park, FL, USA, atallah@post.harvard.edu.
B Martin-Perez
M Albert
T deBeche-Adams
G Nassif
L Hunter
S Larach
Center for Independent Living · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransanal TME is a new approach to performing minimally invasive rectal resection. It is particularly well suited for patients with locally advanced distal rectal cancer and obesity, where the abdominal approach is challenging. Transanal TME can be performed with either TAMIS or TEM. Here, we report our initial experience with transanal TME using TAMIS (TAMIS-TME).

methodsPatients were selected to undergo transanal TME using the TAMIS platform (TAMIS-TME) primarily for malignant disease, but also for select cases of benign disease. Transanal TME defines a "bottom-up" approach to en bloc rectal cancer resection. Transanal TME requires abdominal access for proximal colonic mobilization and is often done in conjunction with a laparoscopic approach.

resultsDuring a 32-month period, 20 patients underwent TAMIS-TME with curative intent. The primary indication for transanal TME was distal, locally advanced rectal cancer. The median age of rectal cancer patients at the time of surgery was 57 years (range 36-73 years) with 30% (6) female and 70% (14) male. The median body mass index (BMI) measured was 24 kg/m(2) (range 18-41 kg/m(2)); this included six patients (30%) with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)). Mean operating time was 243 min (range 140-495 min) with blood loss averaging 153 ml. Postoperative length of stay averaged 4.5 days (range 3-24 days). There was no 30-day postoperative mortality. Surgical complications included wound infection (n = 2), pelvic abscess (n = 4), and prolonged ileus (n = 4). The anastomotic leak rate was 6.7% (1/15). Of the 20 patients who underwent resection, 90% (18/20) had negative margins. Pathologic grading of the TME specimen revealed that 85% (17/20) of transanal TME specimens were found to have "completely" or "near-completely" intact mesorectal envelopes. Data collected during the 6-month median follow-up period revealed that only one patient had developed distant metastasis. There was no locoregional recurrence in any of the patients.

conclusionsTransanal TME is a feasible method for oncologic resection of locally advanced mid- and distal-rectal cancer with curative intent. It has special application for patients with obesity and anatomic constraints such as a narrow male pelvis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnal CanalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRectal NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24272607
OpenAlexW2075140798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.