Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24272205›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2014

High-throughput mutation profiling identifies novel molecular dysregulation in high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early gastric cancers.

Matteo Fassan, Michele Simbolo, Emilio Bria, Andrea Mafficini, Sara Pilotto, Paola Capelli, Maria Bencivenga, Sara Pecori, Claudio Luchini, Diogo Neves and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Molecular Landscapes of Gastric Pre-Neoplastic and Pre-Invasive Lesions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Role of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of noninvasive gastric neoplasia.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Genome-wide transcriptional analysis ofPharmaceutical biology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Identification of early genetic changes in well-differentiated intramucosal gastric carcinoma by target deep sequencing.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2019
    Article
  16. Molecular profiling and comprehensive genome-wide analysis of somatic copy number alterations in gastric intramucosal neoplasias based on microsatellite status.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Tumor suppressor genes in familial adenomatous polyposis.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matteo FassanDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, ARC-NET Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Michele Simbolo
Emilio Bria
Andrea Mafficini
Sara Pilotto
Paola Capelli
Maria Bencivenga
Sara Pecori
Claudio Luchini
Diogo Neves
Giona Turri
Caterina Vicentini
Licia Montagna
Anna Tomezzoli
Giampaolo Tortora
Marco Chilosi
Giovanni De Manzoni
Aldo Scarpa
Rust College · USUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is still no widely accepted molecular marker available to distinguish between gastric high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-IEN) and invasive early gastric cancer (EGC).

methodsHG-IEN and EGC lesions coexisting in the same patient were manually microdissected from a series of 15 gastrectomies for EGC; 40 ng DNA was used for multiplex PCR amplification using the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Panel, which explores the mutational status of hotspot regions in 50 cancer-associated genes.

resultsOf the 15 EGCs, 12 presented at least one somatic mutation among the 50 investigated genes, and 6 of these showed multiple driver gene somatic mutations. TP53 mutations were observed in 9 cases; APC mutations were identified in 3 cases; and ATM and STK11 were mutated in 2 cases. Seven HG-IEN lesions shared an identical mutational profile with the EGC from the same patient; 13 mutations observed in APC, ATM, FGFR3, PIK3CA, RB1, STK11, and TP53 genes were shared by both HG-IEN and ECG lesions. CDKN2A, IDH2, MET, and RET mutations were observed only in EGC. TP53 deregulation was further investigated in an independent series of 75 biopsies corresponding to all the phenotypic lesions occurring in the EGC carcinogenetic cascade. p53 nuclear immunoreaction progressively increased along with the dedifferentiation of the lesions (P < 0.001). Overall, 18 of 20 p53-positive lesions showed a TP53 mutated gene. DISCUSSION: Our results support the molecular similarity between HG-IEN and EGC and suggest a relevant role for TP53 in the progression to the invasive phenotype and the use of immunohistochemistry as a surrogate to detect TP53 gene mutations.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedBiopsyCarcinoma in SituDisease ProgressionFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm InvasivenessPrecancerous ConditionsRetrospective StudiesTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID24272205
OpenAlexW2024611546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.