ArticlePhotosynthesis research1996
Binary oscillations in the Kok model of oxygen evolution in oxygenic photosynthesis.
Article in Photosynthesis research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tuning Shinkarev's Bicycle: Separating the Parallel Cycles of Photosystem II Using Empirical Wavelet Transform.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Regulation of light energy conversion between linear and cyclic electron flow within photosystem II controlled by the plastoquinone/quinol redox poise.Photosynthesis research · 2023Article
- Cyclic electron flow around photosystem II in silico: How it works and functions in vivo.Photosynthesis research · 2023Article
- Flash-induced oxygen evolution in photosynthesis: simple solution for the extended S-state model that includes misses, double-hits, inactivation, and backward-transitions.Biophysical journal · 2005Article
- Interactions of photosystem II with bicarbonate, formate and acetate.Photosynthesis researchArticle
- Effects of methanol on the Si-state transitions in photosynthetic water-splitting.Photosynthesis researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The flash-induced kinetics of various characteristics of Photosystem II (PS II) in the thylakoids of oxygenic plants are modulated by a period of two, due to the function of a two-electron gate in the electron acceptor side, and by a period of four, due to the changes in the state of the oxygen-evolving complex. In the absence of inhibitors of PS II, the assignment of measured signal to the oxygen-evolving complex or to quinone acceptor side has frequently been done on the basis of the periodicity of its flash-induced oscillations, i.e. four or two. However, in some circumstances, the period four oscillatory processes of the donor side of PS II can generate period two oscillations. It is shown here that in the Kok model of oxygen evolution (equal misses and equal double hits), the sum of the concentrations of the S 0 and S 2 states (as well as the sum of concentrations of S 1 and S 3 states) oscillates with period of two: S 0+S 2→S 1+S 3→S 0+S 2→S 1+S 3. Moreover, in the generalized Kok model (with specific miss factors and double hits for each S-state) there always exist such ε0, ε1, ε2, ε3 that the sum ε0[S0] + ε1[S1] + ε2[S2] + ε3[S3] oscillates with period of two as a function of flash number. Any other coefficients which are linearly connected with these coefficients, % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr% 4rNCHbGeaGak0dh9WrFfpC0xh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf% ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr% 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbew7aLzaaja% aaaa!3917!\[\hat \varepsilon \]i = c1εi + c2, also generate binary oscillations of this sum. Therefore, the decomposition of the flash-induced oscillations of some measured parameters into binary oscillations, depending only on the acceptor side of PS II, and quaternary oscillations, depending only on the donor side of PS II, becomes practically impossible when measured with techniques (such as fluorescence of chlorophyll a, delayed fluorescence, electrochromic shift, transmembrane electrical potential, changes of pH and others) that could not spectrally distinguish the donor and acceptor sides. This property of the Kok cycle puts limits on the simultaneous analysis of the donor and acceptor sides of the RC of PS II in vivo and suggests that binary oscillations are no longer a certain indicator of the origin of a signal in the acceptor side of PS II.
Identifiers
24271481What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.