ArticlePhotosynthesis research1996
EPR and ENDOR studies of the water oxidizing complex of Photosystem II.
Article in Photosynthesis research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Water oxidation in photosystem II.Photosynthesis research · 2019Review
- Metal ion oxidation state assignment based on coordinating ligand hyperfine interaction.Photosynthesis research · 2015Review
- Pulse electron paramagnetic resonance studies of the interaction of methanol with the S2 state of the Mn4O5Ca cluster of photosystem II.Biochemistry · 2014Article
- Is Mn-Bound Substrate Water Protonated in the S(2) State of Photosystem II?Applied magnetic resonance · 2010Article
- Proton environment of reduced Rieske iron-sulfur cluster probed by two-dimensional ESEEM spectroscopy.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2009Article
- Oxidative photosynthetic water splitting: energetics, kinetics and mechanism.Photosynthesis research · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A comparative study of X-band EPR and ENDOR of the S2 state of photosystem II membrane fragments and core complexes in the frozen state is presented. The S2 state was generated either by continuous illumination at T=200 K or by a single turn-over light flash at T=273 K yielding entirely the same S2 state EPR signals at 10 K. In membrane fragments and core complex preparations both the multiline and the g=4.1 signals were detected with comparable relative intensity. The absence of the 17 and 23 kDa proteins in the core complex preparation has no effect on the appearance of the EPR signals. (1)H-ENDOR experiments performed at two different field positions of the S2 state multiline signal of core complexes permitted the resolution of four hyperfine (hf) splittings. The hf coupling constants obtained are 4.0, 2.3, 1.1 and 0.6 MHz, in good agreement with results that were previously reported (Tang et al. (1993) J Am Chem Soc 115: 2382-2389). The intensities of all four line pairs belonging to these hf couplings are diminished in D2O. A novel model is presented and on the basis of the two largest hfc's distances between the manganese ions and the exchangeable protons are deduced. The interpretation of the ENDOR data indicates that these hf couplings might arise from water which is directly ligated to the manganese of the water oxidizing complex in redox state S2.
Identifiers
24271303What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.