Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24271303›Full record

ArticlePhotosynthesis research1996

EPR and ENDOR studies of the water oxidizing complex of Photosystem II.

R Fiege, W Zweygart, R Bittl, N Adir, G Renger, W Lubitz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photosynthesis research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Water oxidation in photosystem II.Photosynthesis research · 2019
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R FiegeMax Volmer-Institut für Biophysikalische und Physikalische Chemie, Technische Universität Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, D-10623, Berlin, Germany.
W Zweygart
R Bittl
N Adir
G Renger
W Lubitz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparative study of X-band EPR and ENDOR of the S2 state of photosystem II membrane fragments and core complexes in the frozen state is presented. The S2 state was generated either by continuous illumination at T=200 K or by a single turn-over light flash at T=273 K yielding entirely the same S2 state EPR signals at 10 K. In membrane fragments and core complex preparations both the multiline and the g=4.1 signals were detected with comparable relative intensity. The absence of the 17 and 23 kDa proteins in the core complex preparation has no effect on the appearance of the EPR signals. (1)H-ENDOR experiments performed at two different field positions of the S2 state multiline signal of core complexes permitted the resolution of four hyperfine (hf) splittings. The hf coupling constants obtained are 4.0, 2.3, 1.1 and 0.6 MHz, in good agreement with results that were previously reported (Tang et al. (1993) J Am Chem Soc 115: 2382-2389). The intensities of all four line pairs belonging to these hf couplings are diminished in D2O. A novel model is presented and on the basis of the two largest hfc's distances between the manganese ions and the exchangeable protons are deduced. The interpretation of the ENDOR data indicates that these hf couplings might arise from water which is directly ligated to the manganese of the water oxidizing complex in redox state S2.

Identifiers

PMID24271303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.