Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24271251›Full record

SynthesisZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2013

Fall detection with body-worn sensors : a systematic review.

L Schwickert, C Becker, U Lindemann, C Maréchal, A Bourke, L Chiari, J L Helbostad, W Zijlstra, K Aminian, C Todd and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Predicting geriatric falls following an episode of emergency department care: a systematic review.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Wearable Stretch Sensors for Human Movement Monitoring and Fall Detection in Ergonomics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Elderly Fall Detection Systems: A Literature Survey.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

L SchwickertDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
C Becker
U Lindemann
C Maréchal
A Bourke
L Chiari
J L Helbostad
W Zijlstra
K Aminian
C Todd
S Bandinelli
J Klenk
FARSEEING Consortium and the FARSEEING Meta Database Consensus Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsFalls among older people remain a major public health challenge. Body-worn sensors are needed to improve the understanding of the underlying mechanisms and kinematics of falls. The aim of this systematic review is to assemble, extract and critically discuss the information available in published studies, as well as the characteristics of these investigations (fall documentation and technical characteristics).

methodsThe searching of publically accessible electronic literature databases for articles on fall detection with body-worn sensors identified a collection of 96 records (33 journal articles, 60 conference proceedings and 3 project reports) published between 1998 and 2012. These publications were analysed by two independent expert reviewers. Information was extracted into a custom-built data form and processed using SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

resultsThe main findings were the lack of agreement between the methodology and documentation protocols (study, fall reporting and technical characteristics) used in the studies, as well as a substantial lack of real-world fall recordings. A methodological pitfall identified in most articles was the lack of an established fall definition. The types of sensors and their technical specifications varied considerably between studies.

conclusionLimited methodological agreement between sensor-based fall detection studies using body-worn sensors was identified. Published evidence-based support for commercially available fall detection devices is still lacking. A worldwide research group consensus is needed to address fundamental issues such as incident verification, the establishment of guidelines for fall reporting and the development of a common fall definition.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsActigraphyEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMonitoring, AmbulatoryTelemedicineTransducers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.