Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24270937›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2014

[Perioperative management of patients with hemophilia].

S Lison, M Spannagl

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of analgesic consumption of hemophilic and non-hemophilic patients in knee arthroplasty.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  2. [Multidisciplinary team model for patients with oral cancer and systemic diseases: an expert consensus].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S LisonKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, Abteilung für Transfusionsmedizin, Zelltherapeutika und Hämostaseologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland, susanne.lison@med.uni-muenchen.de.
M Spannagl
LMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemophilia A and hemophilia B are X chromosome-linked congenital bleeding disorders caused by a deficiency or absence of activity of coagulation factor VIII (hemophilia A) or factor IX (hemophilia B), which are graded in different degrees of severity (mild, moderate, severe). Depending on the severity patients may experience spontaneous bleeding episodes or will develop excessive bleeding in the context of injuries or surgery. Hemophilia should not be a contraindication for an invasive procedure; however, a number of conditions are required to provide successful surgery and an uncomplicated and safe postoperative course. This review provides an overview of hemophilia and the key biochemical laboratory and clinical aspects as well as possible specific and non-specific treatment options and addresses the special needs for the perioperative care of these patients.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaHemophilia AHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsPerioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID24270937
OpenAlexW1231827352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.