Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24270389›Full record

Observational studyBone marrow transplantation2014

Second transplants for multiple myeloma relapsing after a previous autotransplant-reduced-intensity allogeneic vs autologous transplantation.

C O Freytes, D H Vesole, J LeRademacher, X Zhong, R P Gale, R A Kyle, D E Reece, J Gibson, H C Schouten, P L McCarthy and 4 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Bone marrow transplantation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Outcomes of Haploidentical Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: An EBMT/CIBMTR Report.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Comparison of Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma Using Three Different Conditioning Regimens.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Autologous/Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation versus Tandem Autologous Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Long-Term Postrelapse Survival.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

C O FreytesSouth Veterans Health Care System and University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
D H VesoleJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
J LeRademacherCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
X ZhongCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
R P GaleSection of Hematology, Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
R A KyleMayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
D E ReecePrincess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
J GibsonRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital Institute of Haematology, Camperdown, Australia.
H C SchoutenInterne Geneeskunde, Academische Ziekenhuis Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands.
P L McCarthyRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
S LonialEmory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
A Y KrishnanCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
A DispenzieriMayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
P N HariCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
Easy-to-read Informed Consent for HCT Clinical TrialsU10HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2011 to 2016
$43.8M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL069294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no standard therapy for multiple myeloma relapsing after an autotransplant. We compared the outcomes of a second autotransplant (N=137) with those of an allotransplant (N=152) after non-myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning (NST/RIC) in 289 subjects reported to the CIBMTR from 1995 to 2008. NST/RIC recipients were younger (median age 53 vs 56 years; P<0.001) and had a shorter time to progression after their first autotransplant. Non-relapse mortality at 1-year post transplant was higher in the NST/RIC cohort, 13% (95% confidence interval (CI), 8-19) vs 2% (95% CI, 1-5, P0.001). Three-year PFS and OS for the NST/RIC cohort were 6% (95% CI, 3-10%) and 20% (95% CI, 14-27%). Similar outcomes for the autotransplant cohort were 12% (95% CI, 7-19%, P=0.038) and 46% (95% CI, 37-55%, P=0.001). In multivariate analyses, risk of death was higher in NST/RIC recipients (hazard ratio (HR) 2.38 (95% CI, 1.79-3.16), P<0.001), those with Karnofsky performance score<90 (HR 1.96 (95% CI, 1.47-2.62), P<0.001) and transplant before 2004 (HR 1.77 (95% CI, 1.34-2.35) P0.001). In conclusion, NST/RIC was associated with higher TRM and lower survival than an autotransplant. As disease status was not available for most allotransplant recipients, it is not possible to determine which type of transplant is superior after autotransplant failure.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProportional Hazards ModelsTransplantation, AutologousTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, HomologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24270389
PMCPMC3947725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.