Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24270058›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair

Functional electrical stimulation to augment poststroke reach and hand opening in the presence of voluntary effort: a pilot study.

Nathaniel S Makowski, Jayme S Knutson, John Chae, Patrick E Crago

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02321254 (A Pilot Study of Active, Robot-assisted Therapy for Shoulder Rehabilitation After Stroke, Using Myoelectric Signals), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02321254 phase1completednot on this map

A Pilot Study of Active, Robot-assisted Therapy for Shoulder Rehabilitation After Stroke, Using Myoelectric Signals

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRan2014 to 2016Enrolled10ConditionsStrokeArmsThe RehaARM-Robot, Standard rehabilitation therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Differences between flexion and extension synergy-driven coupling at the elbow, wrist, and fingers of individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathaniel S Makowski1Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jayme S Knutson
John Chae
Patrick E Crago
Cleveland Hearing & Speech Center · USMetroHealth · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandKL2TR000440 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$11.1M
Clinical Trials in Stroke RehabilitationK24HD054600 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAE, JOHN · 2007 to 2011
$732k
Implanted Neuroprosthesis for Restoring Arm and Hand Function after StrokeR21HD055256 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KNUTSON, JAYME S. · 2008 to 2009
$365k
NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD054600NICHD NIH HHS K24HD054600NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD055256NICHD NIH HHS R21HD055256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemiparesis after stroke can severely limit an individual's ability to perform activities of daily living. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) has the potential to generate functional arm and hand movements. We have observed that FES can produce functional hand opening when a stroke patient is relaxed, but the FES-produced hand opening is often overpowered by finger flexor coactivation in response to patient attempts to reach and open the hand.

objectiveTo determine if stimulating both reaching muscles and hand opening muscles makes it possible to achieve useful amounts of simultaneous reach and hand opening even in the presence of submaximal reaching effort.

methodsWe measured reach and hand opening during a reach-then-open the hand task under different combinations of voluntary effort and FES for both reach and hand opening.

resultsAs effort was reduced and stimulation generated more movement, a greater amount of reach and hand opening was achieved. For the first time, this study quantified the effect of voluntary effort for reach and hand opening on stimulated hand opening. It also showed variability in the interaction of voluntary effort and stimulation between participants. Additionally, when participants were instructed to reach with partial effort during simultaneous FES, they achieved greater reach and hand opening.

conclusionsSimultaneous reaching and FES hand opening is improved by including FES for reach and reducing voluntary effort. In the future, an upper extremity neuroprosthesis that uses a combination of voluntary effort and FES assistance may enable users to perform activities of daily living.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyAgedArmBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyHandHand StrengthHumansMiddle AgedMotor ActivityMovementMuscle, SkeletalPilot ProjectsStrokeTask Performance and AnalysisFEShand openingneuroprosthesisreachstrokeupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID24270058
PMCPMC4128408
OpenAlexW2101229098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.