Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24269681›Full record

ReviewFEBS letters2014

Phage protein-targeted cancer nanomedicines.

V A Petrenko, P K Jayanna

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Modeling the Binding of Anticancer Peptides and Mcl-1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Anti-cancer peptide-based therapeutic strategies in solid tumors.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2022
    Article
  6. Bacteriophages as Solid Tumor Theragnostic Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Promiscuous tumor targeting phage proteins.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2016
    Article
  17. Selection of Lung Cancer-Specific Landscape Phage for Targeted Drug Delivery.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V A PetrenkoDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, AL 36849, United States. Electronic address: petreva@auburn.edu.
P K JayannaDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, AL 36849, United States.
Auburn University · US

Funding

Physico-Chemical Nanocharacterization CoreU54CA151881 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SRIDHAR, SRINIVAS · 2010 to 2014
$12.4M
Drug Delivery Carriers Targeted to Breast Tumor by Fusion Phage ProteinsR01CA125063 · NCI · AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT AUBURN · PI PETRENKO, VALERY A. · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125063NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoencapsulation of anticancer drugs improves their therapeutic indices by virtue of the enhanced permeation and retention effect which achieves passive targeting of nanoparticles in tumors. This effect can be significantly enhanced by active targeting of nanovehicles to tumors. Numerous ligands have been proposed and used in various studies with peptides being considered attractive alternatives to antibodies. This is further reinforced by the availability of peptide phage display libraries which offer an unlimited reservoir of target-specific probes. In particular landscape phages with multivalent display of target-specific peptides which enable the phage particle itself to become a nanoplatform creates a paradigm for high throughput selection of nanoprobes setting the stage for personalized cancer management. Despite its promise, this conjugate of combinatorial chemistry and nanotechnology has not made a significant clinical impact in cancer management due to a lack of using robust processes that facilitate scale-up and manufacturing. To this end we proposed the use of phage fusion protein as the navigating modules of novel targeted nanomedicine platforms which are described in this review.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNanomedicineNeoplasmsViral ProteinsViral Proteins1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-[phospho-rac-(1-glycerol)]1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[amino(polyethylene glycol)2000]cell-penetrating peptidesCHOLcholesterolCPPdiphenylhexatrieneDOTAPDPHDPPGePCFETfluorescence energy transferLandscape phageligand-mediated targetingLMTMajor coat proteinNanomedicinePEGPEG2K-PEPhage displayphosphatidylcholine (egg)polyethylene glycolsiRNAsmall interfering RNATargeted drug deliveryTMtrans-membrane

Identifiers

PMID24269681
PMCPMC4557960
OpenAlexW2062851422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.