Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24269252›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2014

Developing and validating trace fear conditioning protocols in C57BL/6 mice.

Michael A Burman, Cassandra A Simmons, Miles Hughes, Lei Lei

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis Modulates Fear Learning through Associative and Nonassociative Mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael A BurmanDepartment of Psychology, Center for Excellence in the Neurosciences, University of New England, United States. Electronic address: mburman@une.edu.
Cassandra A SimmonsDepartment of Psychology, Center for Excellence in the Neurosciences, University of New England, United States. Electronic address: Csimmons2@une.edu.
Miles HughesDepartment of Psychology, Center for Excellence in the Neurosciences, University of New England, United States. Electronic address: Mhughes6@une.edu.
Lei LeiDepartment of Biology, Center for Excellence in the Neurosciences, University of New England, United States. Electronic address: llei@une.edu.

Funding

Tissue resident macrophages in sensory ganglia: function and impact on nociceptionP20GM103643 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND · PI MENG, IAN D · 2012 to 2021
$20.9M
Assessing the development of hippocampus-amygdala interactions during emotional lR15MH093950 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND · PI BURMAN, MICHAEL A · 2012 to 2012
$405k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103643NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103643NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH093950NIMH NIH HHS R15MH093950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClassical fear conditioning is commonly used to study the biology of fear, anxiety and memory. Previous research demonstrated that delay conditioning requires a neural circuit involving the amygdala, but not usually the hippocampus. Trace and contextual fear conditioning require the amygdala and hippocampus. While these paradigms were developed primarily using rat models, they are increasingly being used in mice. NEW

methodThe current studies develop trace fear conditioning and control paradigms to allow for the assessment of trace and delay fear conditioning in C57BL/6N mice. Our initial protocol yielded clear delay and contextual conditioning. However, trace conditioning failed to differentiate from an unpaired group and was not hippocampus-dependent. These results suggested that the protocol needed to be modified to specifically accommodate trace conditioning the mice. In order to reduce unconditioned freezing and increase learning, the final protocol was developed by decreasing the intensity of the tone and by increasing the inter-trial interval.

resultsOur final protocol produced trace conditioned freezing that was significantly greater than that followed unpaired stimulus exposure and was disrupted by hippocampus lesions. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsA review of the literature produced 90 articles using trace conditioning in mice. Few of those articles used any kind of behavioral control group, which is required to rule out non-associative factors causing fearful behavior. Fewer used unpaired groups involving tones and shocks within a session, which is the optimal control group.

conclusionsOur final trace conditioning protocol can be used in future studies examining genetically modified C57BL/6N mice.

Indexed as

Conditioning, PsychologicalFearPsychological TechniquesAcoustic StimulationAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsElectroshockHippocampusLearningMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMotor ActivityRandom AllocationTime FactorsAssociative learningBehaviorConditioningFearMouse

Identifiers

PMID24269252
PMCPMC3927557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.