Trial reportLancet (London, England)2014
Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 325 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
MRI Evaluation of Nidus Occlusion After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations - A Prospective Preliminary Study
Who cites it
325 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,170 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the safety and efficacy of transvenous embolization for brain arteriovenous malformation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Pooled it
- Treatment outcomes of Spetzler-Ponce grade A brain AVMs in a low-volume center: a systematic review and single institution experience.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Long-Term Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Focused Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Based on Rupture Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Translational stroke research · 2025Pooled it
- Analysis of the incidence of death, hemorrhage, and neurological deficit in the treatment of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs): surgery versus other treatments - a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term complications and outcomes of therapeutic embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2024Pooled it
- Value of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the follow-up of treated brain arteriovenous malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2023Pooled it
- Surgical management outcomes of intracranial arteriovenous malformations after preoperative embolization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2022Pooled it
- Segmentation techniques of brain arteriovenous malformations for 3D visualization: a systematic review.La Radiologia medica · 2022Pooled it
- Preoperative embolisation of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2022Pooled it
- Surgery for cerebral cavernous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2022Pooled it
- Exclusion treatment of ruptured and unruptured low-grade brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review.Neuroradiology · 2022Pooled it
- Treatments of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline.Neurosurgery · 2020Guideline
- Systematic Review of Functional Mapping and Cortical Reorganization in the Setting of Arteriovenous Malformations, Redefining Anatomical Eloquence.Frontiers in surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Interventions for treating brain arteriovenous malformations in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Medical management and intervention (using neurosurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery) versus medical management alone for symptomatic brain cavernoma: the CARE pilot RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Trial
- Controlled arterial hypotension during resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.BMC neurology · 2021Trial
- Treatment Outcomes of Endovascular Embolization Only in Patients with Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Subgroup Analysis of ARUBA (A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations).AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Trial
- Article
- Transvenous Embolisation-Based Strategies for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2026Review
265 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 15 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical benefit of preventive eradication of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations remains uncertain. A Randomised trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA) aims to compare the risk of death and symptomatic stroke in patients with an unruptured brain arteriovenous malformation who are allocated to either medical management alone or medical management with interventional therapy.
methodsAdult patients (≥18 years) with an unruptured brain arteriovenous malformation were enrolled into this trial at 39 clinical sites in nine countries. Patients were randomised (by web-based system, in a 1:1 ratio, with random permuted block design [block size 2, 4, or 6], stratified by clinical site) to medical management with interventional therapy (ie, neurosurgery, embolisation, or stereotactic radiotherapy, alone or in combination) or medical management alone (ie, pharmacological therapy for neurological symptoms as needed). Patients, clinicians, and investigators are aware of treatment assignment. The primary outcome is time to the composite endpoint of death or symptomatic stroke; the primary analysis is by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00389181.
findingsRandomisation was started on April 4, 2007, and was stopped on April 15, 2013, when a data and safety monitoring board appointed by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health recommended halting randomisation because of superiority of the medical management group (log-rank Z statistic of 4·10, exceeding the prespecified stopping boundary value of 2·87). At this point, outcome data were available for 223 patients (mean follow-up 33·3 months [SD 19·7]), 114 assigned to interventional therapy and 109 to medical management. The primary endpoint had been reached by 11 (10·1%) patients in the medical management group compared with 35 (30·7%) in the interventional therapy group. The risk of death or stroke was significantly lower in the medical management group than in the interventional therapy group (hazard ratio 0·27, 95% CI 0·14-0·54). No harms were identified, other than a higher number of strokes (45 vs 12, p<0·0001) and neurological deficits unrelated to stroke (14 vs 1, p=0·0008) in patients allocated to interventional therapy compared with medical management.
interpretationThe ARUBA trial showed that medical management alone is superior to medical management with interventional therapy for the prevention of death or stroke in patients with unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations followed up for 33 months. The trial is continuing its observational phase to establish whether the disparities will persist over an additional 5 years of follow-up.
fundingNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.