Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24268099›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2013

Health service costs and clinical gains of psychotherapy for personality disorders: a randomized controlled trial of day-hospital-based step-down treatment versus outpatient treatment at a specialist practice.

Elfrida Hartveit Kvarstein, Espen Arnevik, Vidar Halsteinli, Frida Gullestad Rø, Sigmund Karterud, Theresa Wilberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00378248 (Ullevål PersonalityProject. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Daytreatment Followed by Outpatient Long-term Combined Treatment Compared With Eclectic Individual Therapy for Patients With Personality Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00378248 naunknown statusnot on this map

Ullevål PersonalityProject. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Daytreatment Followed by Outpatient Long-term Combined Treatment Compared With Eclectic Individual Therapy for Patients With Personality Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2004 to 2016Enrolled120ConditionsPersonality DisordersArmsCombined psychotherapy, Outpatient individual psychotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Personality disorders: the impact of severity on societal costs.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elfrida Hartveit KvarsteinDepartment of Personality Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0407 Oslo, Norway. elfridak@online.no.
Espen Arnevik
Vidar Halsteinli
Frida Gullestad Rø
Sigmund Karterud
Theresa Wilberg
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDay-hospital-based treatment programmes have been recommended for poorly functioning patients with personality disorders (PD). However, more research is needed to confirm the cost-effectiveness of such extensive programmes over other, presumably simpler, treatment formats.

methodsThis study compared health service costs and psychosocial functioning for PD patients randomly allocated to either a day-hospital-based treatment programme combining individual and group psychotherapy in a step-down format, or outpatient individual psychotherapy at a specialist practice. It included 107 PD patients, 46% of whom had borderline PD, and 40% of whom had avoidant PD. Costs included the two treatment conditions and additional primary and secondary in- and outpatient services. Psychosocial functioning was assessed using measures of global (observer-rated GAF) and occupational (self-report) functioning. Repeated assessments over three years were analysed using mixed models.

resultsThe costs of step-down treatment were higher than those of outpatient treatment, but these high costs were compensated by considerably lower costs of other health services. However, costs and clinical gains depended on the type of PD. For borderline PD patients, cost-effectiveness did not differ by treatment condition. Health service costs declined during the trial, and functioning improved to mild impairment levels (GAF > 60). For avoidant PD patients, considerable adjuvant health services expanded the outpatient format. Clinical improvements were nevertheless superior to the step-down condition.

conclusionOur results indicate that decisions on treatment format should differentiate between PD types. For borderline PD patients, the costs and gains of step-down and outpatient treatment conditions did not differ. For avoidant PD patients, the outpatient format was a better alternative, leaning, however, on costly additional health services in the early phase of treatment.

trial registrationClinical Trials NCT00378248.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAdultAmbulatory CareCost-Benefit AnalysisDay Care, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPersonality DisordersPsychotherapyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24268099
PMCPMC4222503
OpenAlexW2035020263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.