ArticleBMC genomics2013
MMDiff: quantitative testing for shape changes in ChIP-Seq data sets.
Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analyzing histone ChIP-seq data with a bin-based probability of being signal.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Review
- ePeak: from replicated chromatin profiling data to epigenomic dynamics.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Article
- Functional data analysis for computational biology.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- dStruct: identifying differentially reactive regions from RNA structurome profiling data.Genome biology · 2019Article
- PREDICTD PaRallel Epigenomics Data Imputation with Cloud-based Tensor Decomposition.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Investigation into the role of the germline epigenome in the transmission of glucocorticoid-programmed effects across generations.Genome biology · 2018Article
- The ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler Chd1 is recruited by transcription elongation factors and maintains H3K4me3/H3K36me3 domains at actively transcribed and spliced genes.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- DGW: an exploratory data analysis tool for clustering and visualisation of epigenomic marks.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- A comprehensive comparison of tools for differential ChIP-seq analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Statistical challenges in analyzing methylation and long-range chromosomal interaction data.Statistics in biosciences · 2016Article
- Inferring differentially expressed pathways using kernel maximum mean discrepancy-based test.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Peak shape clustering reveals biological insights.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Quantitative genomic analysis of RecA protein binding during DNA double-strand break repair reveals RecBCD action in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- M3D: a kernel-based test for spatially correlated changes in methylation profiles.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- From reads to regions: a Bioconductor workflow to detect differential binding in ChIP-seq data.F1000Research · 2015Article
- Uncovering correlated variability in epigenomic datasets using the Karhunen-Loeve transform.BioData mining · 2015Article
- Transcription factor binding predicts histone modifications in human cell lines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCell-specific gene expression is controlled by epigenetic modifications and transcription factor binding. While genome-wide maps for these protein-DNA interactions have become widely available, quantitative comparison of the resulting ChIP-Seq data sets remains challenging. Current approaches to detect differentially bound or modified regions are mainly borrowed from RNA-Seq data analysis, thus focusing on total counts of fragments mapped to a region, ignoring any information encoded in the shape of the peaks.
resultsHere, we present MMDiff, a robust, broadly applicable method for detecting differences between sequence count data sets. Based on quantifying shape changes in signal profiles, it overcomes challenges imposed by the highly structured nature of the data and the paucity of replicates.We first use a simulated data set to compare the performance of MMDiff with results obtained by four alternative methods. We demonstrate that MMDiff excels when peak profiles change between samples. We next use MMDiff to re-analyse a recent data set of the histone modification H3K4me3 elucidating the establishment of this prominent epigenomic marker. Our empirical analysis shows that the method yields reproducible results across experiments, and is able to detect functional important changes in histone modifications. To further explore the broader applicability of MMDiff, we apply it to two ENCODE data sets: one investigating the histone modification H3K27ac and one measuring the genome-wide binding of the transcription factor CTCF. In both cases, MMDiff proves to be complementary to count-based methods. In addition, we can show that MMDiff is capable of directly detecting changes of homotypic binding events at neighbouring binding sites. MMDiff is readily available as a Bioconductor package.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that higher order features of ChIP-Seq peaks carry relevant and often complementary information to total counts, and hence are important in assessing differential histone modifications and transcription factor binding. We have developed a new computational method, MMDiff, that is capable of exploring these features and therefore closes an existing gap in the analysis of ChIP-Seq data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.