Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24267861›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2013

Effects on antibiotic dispensing rates of interventions to promote delayed prescribing for respiratory tract infections in primary care.

Sigurd Høye, Svein Gjelstad, Morten Lindbæk

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Evidence-Based Development of an Intervention to Improve Clinical Health Literacy Practice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sigurd HøyeAntibiotic Center for Primary Care, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Svein Gjelstad
Morten Lindbæk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed antibiotic prescribing is an effective method of reducing the consumption of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections (RTIs). However, interventions to promote its use remain unexplored.

aimTo measure the effects of a GP educational intervention and a computer delayed-prescribing pop-up reminder on antibiotic-dispensing rates. The study also aimed to identify factors influencing GPs' decisions to issue delayed prescriptions and patients' decisions to fill their prescriptions. DESIGN AND

settingControlled trial nested within a cluster-randomised controlled trial in urban and rural practices in 11 counties in southern Norway.

methodEducational intervention and control groups were randomly populated from 81 continuing medical education groups. Within the intervention arm, 107 of the 156 participating GPs were assigned, based on the electronic patient-record system they used, to having a pop-up reminder installed on their computers. Data on prescribed and dispensed antibiotics from 1 year before, and 1 year during, the intervention were collected and linked.

resultsValid data were obtained from 328 GPs (75%). At baseline, 92.1% of prescriptions were filled at pharmacies. The effect of the educational intervention was a 1% reduction in approximated risk (risk ratio [RR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.96 to 1.01) of antibiotics being dispensed, while the combined effect of the educational and pop-up reminder intervention was a 4% reduction in approximated risk (RR 0.96, 95% CI = 0.94 to 0.98). In the pop-up intervention group, 11.0% of the prescriptions were issued as delayed prescriptions and 59.2% of these were filled. Upper RTI, sinusitis, and otitis gave highest odds for delayed prescribing and lowest odds for dispensing.

conclusionPromoting delayed prescribing among GPs results in a small decrease in antibiotic dispensing. The savings potential is greatest for upper RTI, sinusitis, and otitis.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug PrescriptionsFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPractice Patterns, Physicians'Reminder SystemsRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID24267861
PMCPMC3809431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.