Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24267856›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2013

The predictive validity of selection for entry into postgraduate training in general practice: evidence from three longitudinal studies.

Fiona Patterson, Filip Lievens, Máire Kerrin, Neil Munro, Bill Irish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Performance of ethnic minority versus White doctors in the MRCGP assessment 2016-2021: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Observational
  5. Improving the effectiveness of embedded behavioral health personnel through situational judgment training.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. UK medical selection: lottery or meritocracy?Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2015
    Article
  17. Licensing exams and judicial review: the closing of one door and opening of others?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  18. Predictive validity of selection for entry into postgraduate training in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  19. General practice careers: choices and judgements.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fiona PattersonUniversity of Cambridge, Work Psychology Group, UK.
Filip Lievens
Máire Kerrin
Neil Munro
Bill Irish

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe selection methodology for UK general practice is designed to accommodate several thousand applicants per year and targets six core attributes identified in a multi-method job-analysis study

aimTo evaluate the predictive validity of selection methods for entry into postgraduate training, comprising a clinical problem-solving test, a situational judgement test, and a selection centre. DESIGN AND

settingA three-part longitudinal predictive validity study of selection into training for UK general practice.

methodIn sample 1, participants were junior doctors applying for training in general practice (n = 6824). In sample 2, participants were GP registrars 1 year into training (n = 196). In sample 3, participants were GP registrars sitting the licensing examination after 3 years, at the end of training (n = 2292). The outcome measures include: assessor ratings of performance in a selection centre comprising job simulation exercises (sample 1); supervisor ratings of trainee job performance 1 year into training (sample 2); and licensing examination results, including an applied knowledge examination and a 12-station clinical skills objective structured clinical examination (OSCE; sample 3).

resultsPerformance ratings at selection predicted subsequent supervisor ratings of job performance 1 year later. Selection results also significantly predicted performance on both the clinical skills OSCE and applied knowledge examination for licensing at the end of training.

conclusionIn combination, these longitudinal findings provide good evidence of the predictive validity of the selection methods, and are the first reported for entry into postgraduate training. Results show that the best predictor of work performance and training outcomes is a combination of a clinical problem-solving test, a situational judgement test, and a selection centre. Implications for selection methods for all postgraduate specialties are considered.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateSchool Admission CriteriaAdultClinical CompetenceEmployee Performance AppraisalFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMedical Staff, HospitalReproducibility of ResultsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID24267856
PMCPMC3809426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.