ArticleRadiologic clinics of North America2014
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography.
Article in Radiologic clinics of North America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- TLN1: an oncogene associated with tumorigenesis and progression.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- A multi-institutional assessment of low-dose protocols in chest computed tomography: Dose and image quality.Acta radiologica open · 2024Article
- Incidental Findings on Low-Dose CT Scan Lung Cancer Screenings and Deaths From Respiratory Diseases.Chest · 2022Article
- Thrombocytosis and abnormal liver enzymes: A trigger for investigation of underlying malignancy.PloS one · 2022Article
- Lung Cancer as a Subsequent Malignant Neoplasm in Survivors of Childhood Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021Article
- Proteomic Signature of Extracellular Vesicles for Lung Cancer Recognition.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Establishing a Cohort and a Biorepository to Identify Biomarkers for Early Detection of Lung Cancer: The Nashville Lung Cancer Screening Trial Cohort.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2021Article
- The cognitive and perceptual processes that affect observer performance in lung cancer detection: a scoping review.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2021Article
- The 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in radiology journals: a bibliometric analysis.Insights into imaging · 2020Article
- Proteomic Approach for Searching for Universal, Tissue-Specific, and Line-Specific Markers of Extracellular Vesicles in Lung and Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- Feasibility of lung cancer screening in developing countries: challenges, opportunities and way forward.Translational lung cancer research · 2019Review
- Computed tomography for suspected pulmonary embolism results in a large number of non-significant incidental findings and follow-up investigations.Emergency radiology · 2019Article
- A collaborative computer aided diagnosis (C-CAD) system with eye-tracking, sparse attentional model, and deep learning.Medical image analysis · 2019Article
- Improved discrimination between benign and malignant LDCT screening-detected lung nodules with dynamic over staticPhysics in medicine and biology · 2018Article
- Prognostic Significance of Large Airway Dimensions on Computed Tomography in the General Population. The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Lung Study.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2018Article
- Lung Nodule DetectionFrontiers in oncology · 2018Article
- Radiomic analysis in prediction of Human Papilloma Virus status.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2017Article
- Lung cancer screening with ultra-low dose CT using full iterative reconstruction.Japanese journal of radiology · 2017Article
- Why and how would we implement a lung cancer screening program?Public health reviews · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Current guidelines endorse low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for smokers and former smokers aged 55 to 74, with at least a 30-pack-year smoking history. Adherence to published algorithms for nodule follow-up is strongly encouraged. Future directions for screening research include risk stratification for selection of the screening population and improvements in the diagnostic follow-up for indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Screening for lung cancer with LDCT has revealed that there are indolent lung cancers that may not be fatal. More research is necessary if the risk-benefit ratio in lung cancer screening is to be maximized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.