Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24267671›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2013

Outcomes of antiretroviral treatment programmes in rural Lesotho: health centres and hospitals compared.

Niklaus Daniel Labhardt, Olivia Keiser, Motlalepula Sello, Thabo Ishmael Lejone, Karolin Pfeiffer, Mary-Ann Davies, Matthias Egger, Jochen Ehmer, Gilles Wandeler, SolidarMed ART Program and IeDEA-Southern Africa

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Decentralising HIV treatment in lower- and middle-income countries.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Niklaus Daniel LabhardtSolidarMed Lesotho, Maseru, Lesotho; University Medical Clinic, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland; niklaus.labhardt@gmail.com.
Olivia Keiser
Motlalepula Sello
Thabo Ishmael Lejone
Karolin Pfeiffer
Mary-Ann Davies
Matthias Egger
Jochen Ehmer
Gilles Wandeler
SolidarMed ART Program and IeDEA-Southern Africa
Kantonsspital Baselland · CHInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

Observational Antiretroviral Studies In Southern Africa (OASIS) CollaborationU01AI069924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITAT BERN · PI Cleophas Chimbetete, Mary-Ann Davies · 2006 to 2026
$55.9M
NIAID NIH HHS 1 U01AI069924-01NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLesotho was among the first countries to adopt decentralization of care from hospitals to nurse-led health centres (HCs) to scale up the provision of antiretroviral therapy (ART). We compared outcomes between patients who started ART at HCs and hospitals in two rural catchment areas in Lesotho.

methodsThe two catchment areas comprise two hospitals and 12 HCs. Patients ≥16 years starting ART at a hospital or HC between 2008 and 2011 were included. Loss to follow-up (LTFU) was defined as not returning to the facility for ≥180 days after the last visit, no follow-up (no FUP) as not returning after starting ART, and retention in care as alive and on ART at the facility. The data were analysed using logistic regression, competing risk regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for sex, age, CD4 cell count, World Health Organization stage, catchment area and type of ART. All analyses were stratified by gender.

resultsOf 3747 patients, 2042 (54.5%) started ART at HCs. Both women and men at hospitals had more advanced clinical and immunological stages of disease than those at HCs. Over 5445 patient-years, 420 died and 475 were LTFU. Kaplan-Meier estimates for three-year retention were 68.7 and 69.7% at HCs and hospitals, respectively, among women (p=0.81) and 68.8% at HCs versus 54.7% at hospitals among men (p<0.001). These findings persisted in adjusted analyses, with similar retention at HCs and hospitals among women (odds ratio (OR): 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-1.09) and higher retention at HCs among men (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.20-1.96). The latter result was mainly driven by a lower proportion of patients LTFU at HCs (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.93).

conclusionsIn rural Lesotho, overall retention in care did not differ significantly between nurse-led HCs and hospitals. However, men seemed to benefit most from starting ART at HCs, as they were more likely to remain in care in these facilities compared to hospitals.

Indexed as

Community Health CentersDrug MonitoringHospitalsAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLesothoMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationTreatment OutcomeAnti-Retroviral Agentsantiretroviral treatmentdecentralizationHIVnurse-based careretention in carerural Southern Africatask shifting

Identifiers

PMID24267671
PMCPMC3838571
OpenAlexW2149677642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.