Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24267186›Full record

ReviewClinics in laboratory medicine2013

Diagnostic molecular microbiology: a 2013 snapshot.

Marilynn Ransom Fairfax, Hossein Salimnia

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in laboratory medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02232711 (Evaluation of Accuracy and Ease of Use of the FilmArray™ Respiratory Panel), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02232711 completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Accuracy and Ease of Use of the FilmArray™ Respiratory Panel (RP EZ) in a CLIA-Waived Clinical Setting

TypeobservationalSponsorBioFire Diagnostics, LLCRan2014 to 2015Enrolled1,082ConditionsUpper Respiratory Infections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomics in medicine: A new era in medicine.World journal of methodology · 2021
    Article
  6. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: A 2018 Snapshot.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marilynn Ransom FairfaxDepartment of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, and Microbiology Division, Detroit Medical Center University Laboratories, 4201 Saint Antoine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Electronic address: mfairfax@dmc.org.
Hossein Salimnia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular testing has a large and increasing role in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. It has evolved significantly since the first probe tests were FDA approved in the early 1990s. This article highlights the uses of molecular techniques in diagnostic microbiology, including "older," as well as innovative, probe techniques, qualitative and quantitative RT-PCR, highly multiplexed PCR panels, some of which use sealed microfluidic test cartridges, MALDI TOF, and nuclear magnetic resonance. Tests are grouped together by technique and target. Tests with similar roles for similar analytes are compared with respect to benefits, drawbacks, and possible problems.

Indexed as

Molecular TypingPathology, MolecularCommunicable DiseasesHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMolecular Probe TechniquesMALDI TOFMolecular microbiologyMultiplex PCR panelsNuclear magnetic resonancePCRProbe testsRapid molecular diagnosis of infections

Identifiers

PMID24267186
PMCPMC7115713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.