ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
Classification of genomic signals using dynamic time warping.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmenting Circadian Biology Research With Data Science.Journal of biological rhythms · 2025Review
- Peak Persistence Diagrams for Shape-Based Signal Estimation.IEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2025Article
- Data-driven classification of ligand unbinding pathways.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- CAT Bridge: an efficient toolkit for gene-metabolite association mining from multiomics data.GigaScience · 2024Article
- The accuracy of forecasted hospital admission for respiratory tract infections in children aged 0-5 years for 2017/2023.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- SpecGMM: Integrating Spectral analysis and Gaussian Mixture Models for taxonomic classification and identification of discriminative DNA regions.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Article
- Biological Sequence Classification: A Review on Data and General Methods.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Effective machine-learning assembly for next-generation amplicon sequencing with very low coverage.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- ML-DSP: Machine Learning with Digital Signal Processing for ultrafast, accurate, and scalable genome classification at all taxonomic levels.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- A degeneration-reducing criterion for optimal digital mapping of genetic codes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Article
- ClickGene: an open cloud-based platform for big pan-cancer data genome-wide association study, visualization and exploration.BioData mining · 2019Article
- Rapid Bacterial Species Delineation Based on Parameters Derived From Genome Numerical Representations.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Article
- Article
- Fast detection and data compensation for electrodes disconnection in long-term monitoring of dynamic brain electrical impedance tomography.Biomedical engineering online · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClassification methods of DNA most commonly use comparison of the differences in DNA symbolic records, which requires the global multiple sequence alignment. This solution is often inappropriate, causing a number of imprecisions and requires additional user intervention for exact alignment of the similar segments. The similar segments in DNA represented as a signal are characterized by a similar shape of the curve. The DNA alignment in genomic signals may adjust whole sections not only individual symbols. The dynamic time warping (DTW) is suitable for this purpose and can replace the multiple alignment of symbolic sequences in applications, such as phylogenetic analysis.
methodsThe proposed method is composed of three main parts. The first part represent conversion of symbolic representation of DNA sequences in the form of a string of A,C,G,T symbols to signal representation in the form of cumulated phase of complex components defined for each symbol. Next part represents signals size adjustment realized by standard signal preprocessing methods: median filtration, detrendization and resampling. The final part necessary for genomic signals comparison is position and length alignment of genomic signals by dynamic time warping (DTW).
resultsThe application of the DTW on set of genomic signals was evaluated in dendrogram construction using cluster analysis. The resulting tree was compared with a classical phylogenetic tree reconstructed using multiple alignment. The classification of genomic signals using the DTW is evolutionary closer to phylogeny of organisms. This method is more resistant to errors in the sequences and less dependent on the number of input sequences.
conclusionsClassification of genomic signals using dynamic time warping is an adequate variant to phylogenetic analysis using the symbolic DNA sequences alignment; in addition, it is robust, quick and more precise technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.