Trial reportTrials2013
Novel design for a phase IIa placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized withdrawal study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CNV1014802 in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.
Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01540630 (A Phase IIa Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Randomized Withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CNV1014802 in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase IIa Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Randomized Withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CNV1014802 in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trigeminal neuralgia.BMJ clinical evidence · 2014Pooled it
- Non-antiepileptic drugs for trigeminal neuralgia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Trial
- Discordance between preclinical and clinical testing of Na V 1.7-selective inhibitors for pain.Pain · 2025Review
- Possible Strategies to Mitigate Placebo or Vehicle Response in Dry Eye Disease Trials: A Narrative Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Review
- Intravenous lacosamide and phenytoin for the treatment of acute exacerbations of trigeminal neuralgia: A retrospective analysis of 144 cases.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022Review
- Inhibition of NaRSC medicinal chemistry · 2022Review
- Status of peripheral sodium channel blockers for non-addictive pain treatment.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2020Review
- Article
- Complementary roles of murine NaScientific reports · 2020Article
- Mining the NaBiochemical pharmacology · 2019Review
- Recent advances in understanding/managing trigeminal neuralgia.F1000Research · 2019Review
- Current and Innovative Pharmacological Options to Treat Typical and Atypical Trigeminal Neuralgia.Drugs · 2018Review
- Enhancing inactivation rather than reducing activation of Nav1.7 channels by a clinically effective analgesic CNV1014802.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2018Article
- Orofacial pain - an update on diagnosis and management.British dental journal · 2017Article
- Review
- High-throughput electrophysiological assays for voltage gated ion channels using SyncroPatch 768PE.PloS one · 2017Article
- A gain-of-function mutation in Nav1.6 in a case of trigeminal neuralgia.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2016Article
- DEEP Study: does EQ-5D-5L measure the impacts of persistent oro-facial pain?Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2015Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a rare severe unilateral facial pain condition. Current guidelines in trigeminal neuralgia management recommend sodium channel blockers--carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine--as the first-line treatment. However, the currently available drugs are often associated with poor tolerability resulting in sub-optimal pain control. CNV1014802 is a novel sodium channel blocker that is being assessed in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Due to the severity of the condition, it is not ethical to conduct a traditional placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial. It is also difficult to use an active control such as carbamazepine, the current gold standard, because of its complex pharmacology and potential for drug interactions. METHODS/
designThe trial uses a randomized withdrawal design to assess efficacy in this rare condition. There is a 21-day open-label phase followed by a randomized 28-day placebo-controlled phase for responders. Thirty patients will be randomized. The primary outcome measure will be pain relief, but secondary measures of quality of life will be of significant importance given the effect of this condition on activities of daily living. Safety and adverse event endpoints are described. DISCUSSION: There have been very few well-controlled, randomized, placebo-controlled studies in trigeminal neuralgia, and the majority of drugs have had other primary uses. Due to the severity of the pain, minimizing the time a patient is administered placebo was a key factor in designing this study. This study will not only provide data on the efficacy of CNV1014802 in trigeminal neuralgia, but will also provide information on the effectiveness and acceptability of a novel trial design in trigeminal neuralgia.
trial registrationTrial number NCT01540630.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.