Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24267010›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Novel design for a phase IIa placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized withdrawal study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CNV1014802 in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.

Joanna M Zakrzewska, Joanne Palmer, Dominik A Ettlin, Mark Obermann, Gerard M P Giblin, Valerie Morisset, Simon Tate, Kevin Gunn

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01540630 (A Phase IIa Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Randomized Withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CNV1014802 in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01540630 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase IIa Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Randomized Withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CNV1014802 in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiogenRan2012 to 2014Enrolled67ConditionsTrigeminal NeuralgiaArmsCNV1014802, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trigeminal neuralgia.BMJ clinical evidence · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Non-antiepileptic drugs for trigeminal neuralgia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Inhibition of NaRSC medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Complementary roles of murine NaScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  11. Mining the NaBiochemical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Joanna M ZakrzewskaFacial pain unit, Division of Diagnostic, Surgical and Medical Sciences, Eastman Dental Hospital, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust/University College London, 256 Gray's Inn Road, WC1X 8LD, London, UK. j.zakrzewska@ucl.ac.uk.
Joanne Palmer
Dominik A Ettlin
Mark Obermann
Gerard M P Giblin
Valerie Morisset
Simon Tate
Kevin Gunn
University College London · GBUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a rare severe unilateral facial pain condition. Current guidelines in trigeminal neuralgia management recommend sodium channel blockers--carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine--as the first-line treatment. However, the currently available drugs are often associated with poor tolerability resulting in sub-optimal pain control. CNV1014802 is a novel sodium channel blocker that is being assessed in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Due to the severity of the condition, it is not ethical to conduct a traditional placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial. It is also difficult to use an active control such as carbamazepine, the current gold standard, because of its complex pharmacology and potential for drug interactions. METHODS/

designThe trial uses a randomized withdrawal design to assess efficacy in this rare condition. There is a 21-day open-label phase followed by a randomized 28-day placebo-controlled phase for responders. Thirty patients will be randomized. The primary outcome measure will be pain relief, but secondary measures of quality of life will be of significant importance given the effect of this condition on activities of daily living. Safety and adverse event endpoints are described. DISCUSSION: There have been very few well-controlled, randomized, placebo-controlled studies in trigeminal neuralgia, and the majority of drugs have had other primary uses. Due to the severity of the pain, minimizing the time a patient is administered placebo was a key factor in designing this study. This study will not only provide data on the efficacy of CNV1014802 in trigeminal neuralgia, but will also provide information on the effectiveness and acceptability of a novel trial design in trigeminal neuralgia.

trial registrationTrial number NCT01540630.

Indexed as

Research DesignDouble-Blind MethodHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePhenyl EthersProlineSodium Channel BlockersTrigeminal NeuralgiaWithholding TreatmentPhenyl EthersProlineSodium Channel Blockersvixotrigine

Identifiers

PMID24267010
PMCPMC4222641
OpenAlexW2148791851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.