ArticleBMC genomics2013
How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks?
Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inference on autoregulation in gene expression with variance-to-mean ratio.Journal of mathematical biology · 2023Article
- Frequency spectra and the color of cellular noise.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Mathematical Modelling in Plant Synthetic Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Systematic analysis of noise reduction properties of coupled and isolated feed-forward loops.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Role of integrated noise in pathway-specific signal propagation in feed-forward loops.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2021Article
- Connecting the molecular function of microRNAs to cell differentiation dynamics.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019Article
- A stochastic model of corneal epithelium maintenance and recovery following perturbation.Journal of mathematical biology · 2019Article
- Sources, propagation and consequences of stochasticity in cellular growth.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Inference for Stochastic Chemical Kinetics Using Moment Equations and System Size Expansion.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- State Space Truncation with Quantified Errors for Accurate Solutions to Discrete Chemical Master Equation.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2016Article
- Promoters Architecture-Based Mechanism for Noise-Induced Oscillations in a Single-Gene Circuit.PloS one · 2016Article
- ACCURATE CHEMICAL MASTER EQUATION SOLUTION USING MULTI-FINITE BUFFERS.Multiscale modeling & simulation : a SIAM interdisciplinary journal · 2016Article
- Article
- Role of relaxation time scale in noisy signal transduction.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe linear noise approximation (LNA) is commonly used to predict how noise is regulated and exploited at the cellular level. These predictions are exact for reaction networks composed exclusively of first order reactions or for networks involving bimolecular reactions and large numbers of molecules. It is however well known that gene regulation involves bimolecular interactions with molecule numbers as small as a single copy of a particular gene. It is therefore questionable how reliable are the LNA predictions for these systems.
resultsWe implement in the software package intrinsic Noise Analyzer (iNA), a system size expansion based method which calculates the mean concentrations and the variances of the fluctuations to an order of accuracy higher than the LNA. We then use iNA to explore the parametric dependence of the Fano factors and of the coefficients of variation of the mRNA and protein fluctuations in models of genetic networks involving nonlinear protein degradation, post-transcriptional, post-translational and negative feedback regulation. We find that the LNA can significantly underestimate the amplitude and period of noise-induced oscillations in genetic oscillators. We also identify cases where the LNA predicts that noise levels can be optimized by tuning a bimolecular rate constant whereas our method shows that no such regulation is possible. All our results are confirmed by stochastic simulations.
conclusionThe software iNA allows the investigation of parameter regimes where the LNA fares well and where it does not. We have shown that the parametric dependence of the coefficients of variation and Fano factors for common gene regulatory networks is better described by including terms of higher order than LNA in the system size expansion. This analysis is considerably faster than stochastic simulations due to the extensive ensemble averaging needed to obtain statistically meaningful results. Hence iNA is well suited for performing computationally efficient and quantitative studies of intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.